Re: [t2] Busybox failed to build

2008-01-17 Thread René Rebe
Hi, the full logs are located in build/$UUID+CFG_NAME/var/adm/logs/* maybe but the important or all errors on a HTTP server. Yours, On 17.01.2008, at 11:45, kkp wrote: Hi There are lots of packages(i.e. libtool, file, cpio, coreutils, findutils, tar, ppp, zile, popt, util-linux, psmisc

Re: [t2] Busybox failed to build

2008-01-17 Thread kkp
kkp wrote: > > Hi > > > ** > > René Rebe-3 wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 15.01.2008, at 06:30, kkp wrote: >> >>> I choose embedded target. But config file did not include busybox. I >>> changed >>> the config file like this: >>> X -1 163.500 base busybox 1.6

Re: [t2] Busybox failed to build

2008-01-17 Thread kkp
Hi There are lots of packages(i.e. libtool, file, cpio, coreutils, findutils, tar, ppp, zile, popt, util-linux, psmisc, tftp-hpa, iptables, iproute, clockspeed) which are not building. It have same problem with uclibc. which log file do you want? ** René Rebe-3 wrot

Re: [t2] Busybox failed to build

2008-01-17 Thread René Rebe
Hi, On 15.01.2008, at 06:30, kkp wrote: I choose embedded target. But config file did not include busybox. I changed the config file like this: X -1 163.500 base busybox 1.6.1 / base/system CROSS INIT 0 but it is failed to build. end up with error: == 10:36:18 =[1]=> Building base/bu

Re: [t2] initramfs

2008-01-17 Thread René Rebe
Hi Martin, thats some days ago already, but IIRC I tested it to work. However, you probably would like to apply some sort of file filtering to only include the minimally needed in the initramfs, so that the system does not get that big and consume most of the systems memory. Yours, On 15.01.200

Re: [t2] Rootfs does not include /dev

2008-01-17 Thread René Rebe
On 14.01.2008, at 10:40, Leen Toelen wrote: Hi, I compiled a system for avr32, which went well. I added some packages, and rebuilt some packages which initially failed, so I guess the rootfs folder changed a lot since the first build. When I look in he rootfs folder, I don't see anything i