Re: [Tagging] Are tunnels only below ground? (Was

2009-11-04 Thread Richard Bullock
I concede. In fact my OLD Encyclopadia Britannica states that a tunnel is excavated underground and a cut and cover is not truly a tunnel. So the question now is how to tag an above ground tunnel-like structure to properly indicate it's characteristics, that is completely enclosed on all

Re: [Tagging] Are tunnels only below ground? (Was

2009-11-04 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
oh and I forgot to give a word of warning in the other direction. Some structures that you might think are bridges are actually tunnels because of the way they were constructed, but I'll leave that to another day ;-) Cheers Andy -Original Message- From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Are tunnels only below ground? (Was

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Childs
2009/11/4 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@googlemail.com oh and I forgot to give a word of warning in the other direction. Some structures that you might think are bridges are actually tunnels because of the way they were constructed, but I'll leave that to another day ;-) Cheers

Re: [Tagging] Are tunnels only below ground? (Was

2009-11-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/11/4 Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net We don't *have* to stick to dictionary definitions here when tagging, as long as the meaning is clear; exactly, this is not generally about dictionary definitions but about the meaning of words. Dictionaries can give you hints if you're unsure. If

Re: [Tagging] Are tunnels only below ground? (Was

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Childs
2009/11/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com 2009/11/4 Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net We don't *have* to stick to dictionary definitions here when tagging, as long as the meaning is clear; exactly, this is not generally about dictionary definitions but about the meaning of

Re: [Tagging] Are tunnels only below ground? (Was

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Childs
2009/11/4 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org 2009/11/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com 2009/11/4 Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net We don't *have* to stick to dictionary definitions here when tagging, as long as the meaning is clear; exactly, this is not generally about dictionary

Re: [Tagging] Are tunnels only below ground? (Was

2009-11-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/11/4 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org Its a Way under a building where the building is either on legs or exists above and on both sides on the way. The way not blocked by a door (to enter the building). However other barrier (eg Staggered Fence or Gate) may exist to limit access to the way.

Re: [Tagging] Breezeway (alternative to the tunnel and covered options)

2009-11-04 Thread Emilie Laffray
2009/11/4 Liz ed...@billiau.net On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Randy wrote: . For example a pocket with a wide opening for both entry and exit, say to a hotel entrance, but no opposite opening. do you mean a porte cochere ?? There was a discussion some time ago on the French mailing list about

Re: [Tagging] Are tunnels only below ground? (Was

2009-11-04 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:22 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/11/4 Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net We don't *have* to stick to dictionary definitions here when tagging, as long as the meaning is clear; exactly, this is not generally about dictionary definitions but

Re: [Tagging] Feature: covered=yes - Added to Map Features Properties

2009-11-04 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Pieren wrote: Then call for comments on the main ML and not only for the three guys subscribed to this relative new list to get a maximum of comments. Roughly 100... and I've not checked the gender balance. But I would add to the above: if it's an important proposal, then by all means

Re: [Tagging] Are tunnels only below ground? (Was

2009-11-04 Thread Liz
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Anthony wrote: And I don't want dotted lines when these passages are rendered - because if I look at that I'm going to expect something that goes underground, dotted lines on an Australian map would make me expect that the way was unsurfaced