Re: [Tagging] Green areas that are not parks (revisited)

2010-05-13 Thread John Smith
2010/5/13 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com: By themselves not, but they are within the residential land and this tagging proposal follows the scheme like highway=service + service=whatever. I admit, it's not the best solution, but it is already a proposed scheme. I don't have a

[Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-13 Thread antony.king
Hi all, We've been slowly mulling over the proposed playground extensions for the last couple of months, and I hope that we've covered all the ground that needs to be covered by now. Could those that care to vote, cast your votes on the page? If you disapprove, please say why and maybe we can

Re: [Tagging] Green areas that are not parks (revisited)

2010-05-13 Thread Roy Wallace
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:20 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: leisure=garden garden=residential Much better. This clearly means you are tagging a particular *type* of garden. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Draft - new barrier values

2010-05-13 Thread Ed Hillsman
I've contributed a new barrier type (post_and_chain) to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types I have a photo that I've taken of one of these, but I haven't been able to figure out how to get it into the wiki. None of the other barrier photos I've seen in the

Re: [Tagging] Draft - new barrier values

2010-05-13 Thread Steve Bennett
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:05 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: The whole proposal seems pretty inconsequential, it's not like you are trying to make a well sued highway tagging scheme redundant. Do we agree there is a basic goal of getting everyone to tag the same way? Perhaps

Re: [Tagging] Draft - new barrier values

2010-05-13 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/5/14 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com: On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:05 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: The whole proposal seems pretty inconsequential, it's not like you are trying to make a well sued highway tagging scheme redundant. Do we agree there is a basic goal of

Re: [Tagging] Draft - new barrier values

2010-05-13 Thread Steve Bennett
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:58 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: right, but just start using these values is too weak. How would you know if anyone else was using some similar scheme but with different tags? tagwatch? OSMdoc? Anyone regularly do this? I'm curious. I don't.

Re: [Tagging] Draft - new barrier values

2010-05-13 Thread John Smith
On 14 May 2010 13:12, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: Do we agree there is a basic goal of getting everyone to tag the same way? Perhaps the propose-comment-vote-implemented lifecycle is not right, but just start using these values is too weak. How would you know if anyone else was