Re: [Tagging] Fixed position GPS receivers

2010-05-19 Thread John Smith
On 19 May 2010 19:38, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote: plus a note=Regularly reassess the position after a significant tectonic plates movement, like once every million years or after an earthquake While earth quakes will allow the plates to shift suddenly, all of the plates are constantly

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Garden specification)

2010-05-19 Thread Jonathan Bennett
On 18/05/2010 21:56, Petr Morávek [Xificurk] wrote: maybe even landuse=allotments if anyone wants to tag each property separately. Nope. That would be allotment=plot or something. Each plot is not a separate garden, but just the parcel of land allocated to a tenant. -- Jonathan (allotment

Re: [Tagging] Fixed position GPS receivers

2010-05-19 Thread Jean-Guilhem Cailton
Le 19/05/2010 06:35, John Smith a écrit : NASA has a list of 421 of these sites located world wide: http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/network/list.html The IGS is a voluntary federation of many worldwide agencies that pool resources and permanent GNSS station data to generate precise GNSS products.

Re: [Tagging] Fixed position GPS receivers

2010-05-19 Thread John Smith
On 19 May 2010 20:05, Jean-Guilhem Cailton j...@arkemie.com wrote: Interesting site list. How about importing it into OSM ? I'm working on parsing the data at present, should have something completed soon. ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Landuse border alignment

2010-05-19 Thread Petr Morávek [Xificurk]
Liz napsal(a): On Sat, 15 May 2010, Petr Morávek [Xificurk] wrote: and the last, most puzzling is landuse=basin An area of water that drains into a river wow, there are some pretty huge ones of those like the Amazon basin the Lake Eyre basin the Mississipi basin the

[Tagging] odd Fences { was Re: Landuse border alignment}

2010-05-19 Thread Bill Ricker
Why would there be a fence within an unmaintained woodland? Fences are commonly used to demarcate ownership. unmaintained unowned +1 1) Fences indicate a FORMER or CURRENT ownership (thus plot) boundary, OR current or former landuse boundary within one ownership, eg planted field or pasture

Re: [Tagging] Parking for businesses..

2010-05-19 Thread Anthony
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote: * Anthony o...@inbox.org [2010-05-18 20:47 -0400]: On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Tyler Gunn ty...@egunn.com wrote: Almost all of these types of parking lots will have some kind of notice that tow-away is enforced for

Re: [Tagging] FW: Parking for businesses..

2010-05-19 Thread John Smith
On 20 May 2010 06:28, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: One problem I have with the concept of access=destination, even beyond the fact that it says right of access, is that parking lots quite often aren't connected to the places they serve. Something like access=customer is therefore *more

Re: [Tagging] FW: Parking for businesses..

2010-05-19 Thread Anthony
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:55 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote: On 20 May 2010 06:28, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: One problem I have with the concept of access=destination, even beyond the fact that it says right of access, is that parking lots quite often aren't connected

Re: [Tagging] FW: FW: Parking for businesses..

2010-05-19 Thread Seventy 7
Yes, exactly. I couldn't have put it better myself!! From: tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org[mailto:tagging-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Sent: 19 May 2010 21:36 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] FW: Parking for businesses..   On Wed, May

Re: [Tagging] FW: Parking for businesses..

2010-05-19 Thread John Smith
On 20 May 2010 07:01, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: The car park is the destination by car for going anywhere, if what you are doing is parking there. You can only park there if that is your allowed destination. Access=destination would be for a public parking lot with a sign that says no

Re: [Tagging] FW: FW: Parking for businesses..

2010-05-19 Thread Tyler Gunn
Access=private works fine, then (along with access=public andaccess=permissive).  Preferably with an additional tag (or relation) withsome indication of who is allowed to park there. Maybe access=customer isn't needed after all. How about something like: access=private

Re: [Tagging] FW: FW: Parking for businesses..

2010-05-19 Thread Anthony
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Tyler Gunn ty...@egunn.com wrote: I think in most circumstances it is probably pretty clear which business a parking lot is intended for though. Agreed, although the situations in which it's not so clear are the ones where OSM could really get an advantage

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Garden specification)

2010-05-19 Thread Stephen Hope
2010/5/19 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com: landuse=recreation_ground OR landuse=residential - do you know any garden that is outside those two areas? Formal gardens/landscaping around commercial and public buildings? The gardens at a parliament house, library etc may be considered

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Garden specification)

2010-05-19 Thread Petr Morávek [Xificurk]
Stephen Hope napsal(a): 2010/5/19 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com: landuse=recreation_ground OR landuse=residential - do you know any garden that is outside those two areas? Formal gardens/landscaping around commercial and public buildings? The gardens at a parliament house,

Re: [Tagging] Fixed position GPS receivers

2010-05-19 Thread John Smith
On 19 May 2010 20:21, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting site list. How about importing it into OSM ? I'm working on parsing the data at present, should have something completed soon. I'm still tweaking the script to deal with the log files, there is some small

Re: [Tagging] Fixed position GPS receivers

2010-05-19 Thread John Smith
On 20 May 2010 10:42, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: man_made=monitoring_station There are other types of monitoring stations, if you visit the webtrak site it shows noise monitoring stations: http://www331.webtrak-lochard.com/webtrak/bne3

Re: [Tagging] FW: FW: Parking for businesses..

2010-05-19 Thread Roy Wallace
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Tyler Gunn ty...@egunn.com wrote: Access=private works fine, then (along with access=public andaccess=permissive).  Preferably with an additional tag (or relation) withsome indication of who is allowed to park there. Maybe access=customer isn't needed

Re: [Tagging] Fixed position GPS receivers

2010-05-19 Thread John Smith
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Fixed position GPS receivers

2010-05-19 Thread John Smith
Here's a sample generated from NASA site log files: node id='-1' visible='true' lat='44.4639' lon='26.12573889' tag k='fixme' v='not_reviewed' / tag k='man_made' v='monitoring_station' / tag k='monitoring:gps' v='yes' / tag k='monitoring:glonass' v='yes' / tag k='iers_domes_number'