On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Phil! Gold <[email protected]> wrote:
> * Anthony <[email protected]> [2010-05-18 20:47 -0400]: > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Tyler Gunn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Almost all of these types of parking lots will have some kind of > > > notice that tow-away is enforced for unauthorized parking. So the > general > > > idea is you're free to park there, ONLY if you're visiting the > businesses > > > serviced by the lot. > > > > Access=destination? No, the public has no right of access. > > I thought the description of access=destination matched this scenario > fairly well. You're saying that it only applies if the road is publicly > owned? (i.e. a strict reading of "right of access" rather than "you're > allowed to be here if...") > I do think access=destination should only be used where people have a right of access. But furthermore, "you're allowed to be here if" isn't the same as "there aren't any signs saying you're not allowed to be here if". If there were a sign which said "anyone may use this parking lot if this is their destination", maybe access=destination is appropriate. But I've never seen such a sign.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
