[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - shop=anime (was: shop=anime_stuff)

2010-12-21 Thread ergo
Hi All. Please vote for new tag shop=anime http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/anime Best regards, ergo ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Rendering locks in Mapnik/Osmarender

2010-12-21 Thread Wyo
Richard Fairhurst wrote: How are your C++ skills? Fairly good but haven't used it for several years. Maybe it's still sufficient for writing a few patches. Why do you ask? Wyo ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Rendering locks in Mapnik/Osmarender

2010-12-21 Thread Wyo
Lennard wrote: On 20-12-2010 22:29, Wyo wrote: Hmm, no remarks at all. Now what shall i do next to get this into renderers? In the case of mapnik: wait. The current version used on osm.org cannot rotate symbols, and we haven't transitioned to the yet-to-be-released mapnik2 either. In the

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Rendering locks in Mapnik/Osmarender

2010-12-21 Thread Peter
According to the Milestone date in 15 hours. http://trac.mapnik.org/milestone/Mapnik2 ...but I don't think so. There is no reliable release date. Peter 2010/12/21 Wyo otto.w...@orpatec.ch: Lennard wrote: On 20-12-2010 22:29, Wyo wrote: Hmm, no remarks at all. Now what shall i do next to get

Re: [Tagging] Deprecated features - highway=disused

2010-12-21 Thread Wyo
Craig Wallace wrote: I think using disused=yes is a very bad idea. It will break all of the existing renderers/applications that don't know Here is a sample of a disused canal which doesn't break at all. I don't think it would break with highways. If you use highway=disused you loose the

Re: [Tagging] Deprecated features - highway=disused

2010-12-21 Thread Craig Wallace
On 21/12/2010 20:17, Wyo wrote: Craig Wallace wrote: I think using disused=yes is a very bad idea. It will break all of the existing renderers/applications that don't know Here is a sample of a disused canal which doesn't break at all. I don't think it would break with highways. If you use

Re: [Tagging] Deprecated features - highway=disused

2010-12-21 Thread Wyo
Craig Wallace wrote: There is a rule in the Mapnik stylesheet specifically for waterway=canal, disused=yes. There is no such rules for highways or anything else. I'm astonished! As an ordinary mapper I'd assume the disused=yes would apply to anything. In the case of highway it would horrible

Re: [Tagging] 0-0 address lines

2010-12-21 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote: ... and the reason for having a '0' was to show where (geometrically) it will be. So if people do know what the housenumber range actually is (or want to extrapolate it from statsCan) they are welcome to. Two

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] refs describing routes instead of ways

2010-12-21 Thread Paul Johnson
On 12/20/2010 02:51 PM, Toby Murray wrote: On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Paul Johnson baloo-PVOPTusIyP/sroww+9z...@public.gmane.org wrote: I'm wondering why we still are trying the whole describe the route on the way method of handling the ref= tag on ways. Because it is currently the

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] refs describing routes instead of ways

2010-12-21 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On 12/20/2010 02:41 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Paul Johnson baloo-PVOPTusIyP/sroww+9z...@public.gmane.org wrote: the way's ACTUAL reference number. Meaning? Well, in context of the