On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:59 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
Personally I think historic=yes isn't a good idea, since you have to
do further digging to be able to classify things, where as stipulating
why it's historic is of much better value.
historic=event needs also further
I announce on behalf of Federico Cozzi that voting is open for
service:bicycle
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/service:bicycle
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Am 03.05.2011 um 11:56 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Car_access_tag
I've updated the draft with concrete verbiage to be added/changed on the access
and Map features pages.
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de Fon +49 151 14070811
This probably should belong on tagging, so I've cc'ed it there, also
you could add to the talk page.
That's a good question, and something I've thought about recently as
well. I've really liked the footway=crossing tag, even more so than
footway=sidewalk, so I've started using path=crossing as