Re: [Tagging] highway=path, path=hiking

2011-07-17 Thread Zsolt Bertalan
Hi, there is no need for path=hiking or path=footpad (unless this a road, where you can run into highwayman, but I probably miss something). The existing tags cover much more than I need. Custom, undocumented tags just won't be rendered, not even on custom renderings. Zsolt Herrbert74 On Sun,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hiking_checkpoint

2011-07-17 Thread Zsolt Bertalan
Hi, I forgot about the fact, that El Camino and the Countrywide Blue Tour are also Tourism Movements. I have links in the proposal. CBT has one route, El Camino has several. So a TM can have several, one or none designated route. I consider the individual trails on trail-blaze.com as Tourism

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hiking_checkpoint

2011-07-17 Thread Steve Bennett
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Zsolt Bertalan herrber...@gmail.com wrote: Is Themed Walk better than Tourism Movement or you just accept that it's a thing coming from the Eastern Block and adopt the term for it? Heh...no one will ever understand what tourism_movement is meant to mean. Let's

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hiking_checkpoint

2011-07-17 Thread John F. Eldredge
Zsolt Bertalan herrber...@gmail.com wrote: Because there is no difference. What is the difference between a rugby match and a rugby union match? Nothing. Both of them are a rugby match. But rugby union match is more specific. In this case we need the general term. There are TMs that are

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hiking_checkpoint

2011-07-17 Thread Zsolt Bertalan
I see. Is hiking campaign better? On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 3:12 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.comwrote: Zsolt Bertalan herrber...@gmail.com wrote: Because there is no difference. What is the difference between a rugby match and a rugby union match? Nothing. Both of them are a rugby

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hiking_checkpoint

2011-07-17 Thread John F. Eldredge
ael law_ence@ntlworld.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 05:23:37PM +0200, Zsolt Bertalan wrote: I don't get it, why is it so hard to understand (not the movement part, the route part). Maybe you could use course because that is used in orienteering

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hiking_checkpoint

2011-07-17 Thread Steve Doerr
accreditation_scheme? accreditation_agency? promoter? On 17/07/2011 14:48, Zsolt Bertalan wrote: I see. Is hiking campaign better? On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 3:12 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com mailto:j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: Zsolt Bertalan herrber...@gmail.com

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hiking_checkpoint

2011-07-17 Thread Richard Welty
On 7/17/11 3:28 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote: aellaw_ence@ntlworld.com wrote: Maybe you could use course because that is used in orienteering (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orienteering) for a series of checkpoints? But can also mean some sort of way. As a native English speaker, I think

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hiking_checkpoint

2011-07-17 Thread Steve Bennett
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Zsolt Bertalan herrber...@gmail.com wrote: That's why we can NOT call the THING a route, trail, walk, etc. THIS would be confusing. trail gets used in this metaphorical way, and it's not that confusing. Here's an example: