[Tagging] Feature Proposal - TMC - New tagging scheme for TMC

2012-04-17 Thread Robert Stack
Hello all, A very interesting proposal, thanks. The TMC Inspector you (Infoware) provided (http://osm-tmc.infoware.de/tmc/) is most helpful in reviewing this, too. Here's an additional question beyond those from Eckhart Worner and others. Some ways span well beyond a single adjacent pair of

[Tagging] Smooth shoulder intended for cycling

2012-04-17 Thread Nathan Edgars II
I'm wondering what the best way would be to tag a good-quality shoulder that acts essentially as an undesignated bike lane, in that you can use it but it is not required. Current Florida DOT policy is to use these on rural roads, with marked bike lanes only when there is a lane to the right.

Re: [Tagging] Smooth shoulder intended for cycling

2012-04-17 Thread Steve Bennett
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: One regional mapper uses cycleway=shoulder for this, but I see that as sub-optimal, since it's primarily a shoulder, not a cycleway. It would be like putting cycleway=sidewalk whenever there's a smooth paved sidewalk.

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Smooth shoulder intended for cycling

2012-04-17 Thread Nathan Edgars II
Hmmm. Apparently Thunderbird's 'reply to list' fails when there are multiple lists. Sending again: On 4/17/2012 11:47 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: I quite like cycleway=shoulder. It describes exactly what's going on: the cycling infrastructure at this point isn't a marked lane (cycleway=lane), nor

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Smooth shoulder intended for cycling

2012-04-17 Thread Steve Bennett
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: It implies that the shoulder is an official cycleway, when in reality it may be full of debris (or worse: http://flbikelaw.org/2012/03/paved-shoulder/ ). You think it implies that because it's a cycleway=* tag? I