On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 18:36 +0300, Mihkel Rämmel wrote:
> Should railway roundhouses be tagged railway=roundhouse (as suggested
> on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Droundhouse)
> or as building=roundhouse? Or both?
> And how would you tag an old roundhouse that is nowadays used for
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Mihkel Rämmel wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Mihkel Rämmel wrote:
>>>
>>> Should railway roundhouses be tagged railway=roundhouse (as suggested on
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ra
Would soon lead to building=roundhouse, railway=roundhouse . Which is
information duplication.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Mihkel Rämmel wrote:
>
>> Should railway roundhouses be tagged railway=roundhouse (as suggested on
>> http://wik
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Mihkel Rämmel wrote:
> Should railway roundhouses be tagged railway=roundhouse (as suggested on
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Droundhouse)
> or as building=roundhouse? Or both?
> And how would you tag an old roundhouse that is nowadays used for
Should railway roundhouses be tagged railway=roundhouse (as suggested on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Droundhouse)
or as building=roundhouse? Or both?
And how would you tag an old roundhouse that is nowadays used for something
else (building=warehouse)?
Mihkel Rämmel
__
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Alan Mintz
wrote:
> At 2012-04-30 01:07, Alex Rollin wrote:
>>
>> OK, So i make bad (formatting and approach) proposal for tag ojeq
>> stand. It is a motorcycle taxi stand.
>
>
> Why not first search for existing usage? Taxi stands are common all over the
> world.
At 2012-04-30 01:07, Alex Rollin wrote:
OK, So i make bad (formatting and approach) proposal for tag ojeq
stand. It is a motorcycle taxi stand.
Why not first search for existing usage? Taxi stands are common all over
the world. Searching the wiki for "taxi" yields:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.
2012/4/30 Pieren :
> I'm always standing in the contributor point of view. It is not the
> wiki (or better said "our recommendations") to follow the osm2pqsql
> style file but the opposite.
+1
> especially
> when the main reaction is to say that mapnik/osm2pgsql will fail
> because the assumpti
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:29:52 Kytömaa Lauri wrote:
> >Before that I added a point in the Open issues section about lanes=1.5
> >and modified the note at the end of the section Narrow road. As
>
> So, today I got a chance to revisit an unpaved residential road
> I've tagged as lanes=1.5 in the distan
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:29:52 Kytömaa Lauri wrote:
> >Before that I added a point in the Open issues section about lanes=1.5
> >and modified the note at the end of the section Narrow road. As
>
> So, today I got a chance to revisit an unpaved residential road
> I've tagged as lanes=1.5 in the distan
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> Right now, we already have to distinguish three types of tags:
> * always area
> * always way
> * way unless area=yes is present.
>
> I simply do not think that the possibility to decrease of the number of
> tags is worth introducing "area un
2012/4/30 Alex Rollin :
> OK, So i make bad (formatting and approach) proposal for tag ojeq
> stand. It is a motorcycle taxi stand.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesia/adaptation/ojeq_stand
You put this into the Indonesia-namespace of the wiki, but proposals
like this, which describ
OK, So i make bad (formatting and approach) proposal for tag ojeq
stand. It is a motorcycle taxi stand.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesia/adaptation/ojeq_stand
Help requested with proposal, please, for formatting, placement, generalization.
Alex
_
13 matches
Mail list logo
