Thomas Davie wrote:
> Actually, the conclusion, while it involved that, also involved that
> there are potential other uses (e.g. on river=intermittent;
> stream=intermittent etc) that need to be checked too, and that this
> seems like an arbitrary renaming of tags that doesn't gain anything,
> b
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:27 PM, SomeoneElse
wrote:
> Well, it's to "document" standards, not to "create" them. If that's what
> you meant by "establish" then +1 to you too.
>
> The biggest problem the wiki has is that in some quarters editing it seems
> to have become an end in itself rather tha
2012/5/29 Steve Bennett :
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
>> So? The wiki is the place for documenting how YOU map, not how other
>> people SHOULD map. The only thing you SHOULDN'T do in the wiki is
>> change the description of how other people map.
+1
> C'mon. Clearly th
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
So? The wiki is the place for documenting how YOU map, not how other
people SHOULD map. The only thing you SHOULDN'T do in the wiki is
change the description of how other people map.
+1 (in the sense of the wiki shouldn't
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
> So? The wiki is the place for documenting how YOU map, not how other
> people SHOULD map. The only thing you SHOULDN'T do in the wiki is
> change the description of how other people map.
C'mon. Clearly that's not true. The primary purpose of t
