Re: [Tagging] tower vs mast vs antenna

2013-02-07 Thread osm
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com In UK English, the word aerial is used instead of antenna. IMO aerial is more the thing on a small device or the receiving antenna on a house roof. I have the impression, not well substantiated, that what I would call a tower in the US is often called a mast in

Re: [Tagging] tower vs mast vs antenna

2013-02-07 Thread Pieren
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:12 AM, John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com wrote: +1 --- for me (UK English), tower implies brickwork or stone. Not always :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eiffel_Tower Pieren ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] tower vs mast vs antenna

2013-02-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/2/7 Jonathan Bennett jonobenn...@gmail.com: On 06/02/2013 20:59, fly wrote: What we call man_made=mast is still a tower and man_made=antenna should be mast, where as antennas are only the transmitter/receiver. To this British English speaker: Tower == any self-supporting structure,

Re: [Tagging] tower vs mast vs antenna

2013-02-07 Thread Philip Barnes
I think that a tower has some means, such as stairs to climb it, so that covers things like the eiffel tower, I would also include a fire station tower in this, many are steel girder structures, but have stairs. Phil -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 07/02/2013 10:56 ael wrote: On Wed, Feb 06,

Re: [Tagging] tower vs mast vs antenna

2013-02-07 Thread Jonathan Bennett
On 07/02/2013 11:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: but: there are antennas where the whole structure acts as antenna (mast=antenna). Maybe this is an example: Yes, but unless you can explain, unambiguously how you identify those vs. other types of mask, you're going to hit a verifiability problem.

Re: [Tagging] tower vs mast vs antenna

2013-02-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/2/7 Jonathan Bennett jonobenn...@gmail.com: On 07/02/2013 11:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: but: there are antennas where the whole structure acts as antenna (mast=antenna). Maybe this is an example: Yes, but unless you can explain, unambiguously how you identify those vs. other types

Re: [Tagging] Grades for obstacle=vegetation

2013-02-07 Thread ael
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 06:47:48PM +0100, Konfrare Albert wrote: Hello, Some people has suggested me to include a gradient for the key obstacle=vegetationhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Obstacle#Values_for_key_obstacle.3D.2A [..] One suggestion was something like

Re: [Tagging] Grades for obstacle=vegetation

2013-02-07 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Konfrare Albert lakonfrariadelav...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Some people has suggested me to include a gradient for the key obstacle=vegetation. One suggestion was something like vegetation=light|medium|dense. I think we don't need so much detail about the