No, when I looked at the code last year there was no indication that you
could do that in any easy way.
The taginfo import is reported to take 10 minutes for Sweden so I guess if
the box isn't that big you can always try to extract it and import it to
your own taginfo db. Now when we have
2013/11/25 Manuel Hohmann mhohm...@physnet.uni-hamburg.de
This means that by any traditional reading, the proposal has been
rejected, even though you seem to avoid the word.
I am not avoiding anything, I am simply stating facts. And as a matter
of fact, there are 19 positive votes, 18
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You are cheating here, the voting period finished at 23
November, and by the 14th of November all 18 no-votes had already
been cast, leading with this apparently clear rejection to
desinterest by other potential rejecters. You are now counting
On 26.11.2013 11:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
This proposal was rejected
according to our rules and I now set it to rejected in the wiki.
The rules also state All suggestions should be taken into account
before a proposal is approved or rejected. The author is trying to do
just that.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote:
Where can I read the rules? I searched the wiki for voting tag
proposals etc and couldn't find them.
On the Proposed_features main page. But don't read it as hard-coded
rules but more as recommendations. I don't like when
2013/11/26 Manuel Hohmann mhohm...@physnet.uni-hamburg.de
- - At the end of the voting period there were 18 yes, 18 no and one
partial yes. If this in in any way a clear result, then it is a draw.
A draw means rejected as it isn't a majority for yes. A partial yes
like an abstain counts as
2013/11/26 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote:
Where can I read the rules? I searched the wiki for voting tag
proposals etc and couldn't find them.
On the Proposed_features main page.
Thanks.
But don't read it as hard-coded
2013/11/26 Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com
I agree strongly. In this case, with an almost perfectly inconclusive
result, I would say it is unfair to stamp the proposal as rejected
since there was not a majority no-vote;
actually this is how things are (and were) done nonetheless. There are
Maybe Tagwatch does what you are looking for?
http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/
Matthijs
On Nov 25, 2013 11:34 PM, Mike Thompson miketh...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to find all of the tags that are used over a user specified
geography (could be a country or a bounding box). Is there anyway to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A draw means rejected as it isn't a majority for yes. A
partial yes like an abstain counts as vote that isn't yes, so
for practical reasons you can count this like a no. At least this
is what the rules had been so far.
A draw is a draw, it's not
2013/11/26 Manuel Hohmann mhohm...@physnet.uni-hamburg.de
A draw means rejected as it isn't a majority for yes.
A draw is a draw, it's not a majority for no either.
yes, rejected ;-)
My aim was to unify the tagging of
these objects, since they all generate light. This idea is not new -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yes, rejected ;-)
I'm really not sure what you don't understand about the word DRAW or
about the fact that the total number of positive votes exceeds the
total number of negative votes. But another fact is that your opinion
does not alter any of
Thanks for the replies. The link Mattthijs provides the information I need
for now.
Erik, good to know the run time to setup ones own taginfo db is reasonable.
Mike
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl
wrote:
Maybe Tagwatch does what you are looking
Hi,
Openstreetmap has been contributing to the Bitcoin revolution with this map:
http://coinmap.org/
the problem is that lots of online businesses want to get on the map, and I
don't know what tags to suggest. Should we invent something like
office=online? Then it could be further specified
Placing online businesses on a world map may be more tricky than you think ...
Yves
Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi,
Openstreetmap has been contributing to the Bitcoin revolution with this
map:
http://coinmap.org/
the problem is that lots of online businesses want to get on the
On 11/26/13 4:13 PM, Yves wrote:
Placing online businesses on a world map may be more tricky than you
think ...
yes. the concept of a geographic location is sometimes
challenging. when the business is running a web store
in the cloud and outsourcing the order fulfillment then
it's hard to say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 26.11.2013 22:31, Richard Welty wrote:
yes. the concept of a geographic location is sometimes challenging.
when the business is running a web store in the cloud and
outsourcing the order fulfillment then it's hard to say exactly
where they
Do we really want to delete this data? Is there any value to it?
What they usually show is the website headquarters. So maybe a good tag is
office=website_headquaters.
2013/11/26 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 26.11.2013 22:31,
Janko Mihelić wrote:
http://coinmap.org/
The video on there didn't mention adding a main tag at all when I
watched it.
the problem is that lots of online businesses want to get on the map,
and I don't know what tags to suggest.
Ignoring the online businesses, there are plenty of
19 matches
Mail list logo
