2013/11/26 Dan S <danstowell+...@gmail.com> > I agree strongly. In this case, with an almost perfectly inconclusive > result, I would say it is unfair to stamp the proposal as "rejected" > since there was not a majority no-vote; >
actually this is how things are (and were) done nonetheless. There are lots of proposals that got rejected with zero no-votes, just because they hadn't gotten enough yes votes. The rules state that you need an absolute majority of "yes" for the approval. If a proposal gets rejected in a voting, this doesn't mean you cannot repropose it (indeed this is what is done here for the second time). > but equally wrong to stamp it > as "sort-of-accepted" (these are the two main positions in this thread > so far!). The message from the voters is clear: maybe, but not in this > exact form. > +1, usually if there are a lot of "no"-votes there is something wrong, even if there is a majority of "yes"-votes. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
