Re: [Tagging] Bitcoin and Online shops

2013-11-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/11/26 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com the problem is that lots of online businesses want to get on the map, and I don't know what tags to suggest. Should we invent something like office=online? Then it could be further specified with online:shop=clothes, online=pizza_delivery, or

Re: [Tagging] Proposal - voting finished - man_made=lamp

2013-11-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/11/26 Manuel Hohmann mhohm...@physnet.uni-hamburg.de yes, rejected ;-) I'm really not sure what you don't understand about the word DRAW or about the fact that the total number of positive votes exceeds the total number of negative votes. I think it is pointless to continue

[Tagging] the proposal process

2013-11-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
When looking for the history of the proposal process page I found it hard to find the evolution of this page before August 2013. Any hints where to look for it? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] the proposal process

2013-11-27 Thread Matthijs Melissen
Hi Martin, It seems that user Fgnievinski split off the page from 'Proposed features': https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_featuresdiff=prevoldid=930880 Note that earlier this month, I have merged the pages 'Creating a proposal' and 'Creating a proposal' into 'Proposal

[Tagging] Proposal - voting finished - man_made=lamp

2013-11-27 Thread Manuel Hohmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think it is pointless to continue discussing about a draw as the rules seem quite clearly to require a majority: A rule of thumb for enough support is *8 unanimous approval votes* or *15 total votes with a majority approval*, but other factors

Re: [Tagging] the proposal process

2013-11-27 Thread Matthijs Melissen
Sorry, that should have been: Note that earlier this month, I have merged the pages 'Creating a proposal' and 'Proposed features' into 'Proposal process', so you might also be interested in the history of these pages. -- Matthijs On 27 November 2013 10:22, Matthijs Melissen

Re: [Tagging] Proposal - voting finished - man_made=lamp

2013-11-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/11/27 Manuel Hohmann mhohm...@physnet.uni-hamburg.de I would go for the established lamp_type as this is in use and has according values. AFAIK lamp_type is rather used as a sub-tag to highway=street_lamp and specifies the type of lantern (gaslight, electric...). Using this on its

Re: [Tagging] Bitcoin and Online shops

2013-11-27 Thread Janko Mihelić
2013/11/26 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org The probably don't care where the pin is as long as it somehow increases their search engine ranking ;) I found a few of those. A travel agency adds a node to the destination, not where their office is. 2013/11/27 SomeoneElse

Re: [Tagging] Bitcoin and Online shops

2013-11-27 Thread Yves
offfice=... is a good key for a ground-truth feature, even if it operates in the cloud. Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com a écrit : 2013/11/26 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org The probably don't care where the pin is as long as it somehow increases their search engine ranking ;) I found a

Re: [Tagging] Bitcoin and Online shops

2013-11-27 Thread Serge Wroclawski
Actually the problem is that most of these businesses adding themselves are doing more harm than good. 1. Many users copy data from Google - There was even a video on coinmap encouraging users to do so 2. There are many users who find the location via nominatim, which doesn't add accuracy to our

Re: [Tagging] Proposal - voting finished - man_made=lamp

2013-11-27 Thread John F. Eldredge
Manuel Hohmann mhohm...@physnet.uni-hamburg.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A draw means rejected as it isn't a majority for yes. A partial yes like an abstain counts as vote that isn't yes, so for practical reasons you can count this like a no. At least this is

Re: [Tagging] Bitcoin and Online shops

2013-11-27 Thread John F. Eldredge
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: On 11/26/13 4:13 PM, Yves wrote: Placing online businesses on a world map may be more tricky than you think ... yes. the concept of a geographic location is sometimes challenging. when the business is running a web store in the cloud and

Re: [Tagging] Bitcoin and Online shops

2013-11-27 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On 11/27/2013 02:59 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote: I was hoping for a general tag that would indicate that something is more online than offline. But I guess that kind of generalization is not really needed and is hardly accurate. office=e-commerce sounds good. I'll start putting those on the nodes

Re: [Tagging] Bitcoin and Online shops

2013-11-27 Thread Janko Mihelić
2013/11/27 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org Commerce, e-commerce... What is the difference nowadays ?Are there any activities left that do not have an online side ? I have a feeling you've got something there. office=commerce seems enough. Janko

Re: [Tagging] Bitcoin and Online shops

2013-11-27 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/11/27 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org Commerce, e-commerce... What is the difference nowadays ?Are there any activities left that do not have an online side ? I have a feeling you've got something there.