Am 24/gen/2014 um 07:46 schrieb Kytömaa Lauri lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi:
It's then only natural that they use tunnel=building_passage or even
tunnel=yes when they map these, totally without any regard to whether some
engineers or geologists or encyclopedia editors have restricted the use of
2014/1/24 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
Am 24/gen/2014 um 07:46 schrieb Kytömaa Lauri lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi:
It's then only natural that they use tunnel=building_passage or even
tunnel=yes when they map these, totally without any regard to whether some
engineers or
:-) Touché
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 24/01/2014 10:30, Simone Saviolo wrote:
2014/1/24 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com
Am 24/gen/2014 um 07:46 schrieb Kytömaa Lauri
lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi mailto:lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi:
It's then
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:39:12PM +0100, Johan C wrote:
It was a bit confusing to me, but tunnel=building_passage seems to be a
better one than covered=yes for the situations when a highway is under a
building. I think ideally such a building should be split giving the
building a different
I made a simple validator of wikipedia tag. It is fetching wikipedia articles
and checking for serious problems. I intended to do some fancy checks - but
for now even looking for articles without coordinates is enough. There are
many instances of improper wikipedia tags in OSM database and
Am 24/gen/2014 um 11:30 schrieb Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
In favor of Kytömaa's observation I'll mention the best-known tunnel in the
world, the Boulevard Louis II in Monaco
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4230891#map=16/43.7369/7.4349), known to
Formula One fans all
Such a test could have a home in keepRight
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
