On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:39:12PM +0100, Johan C wrote: > It was a bit confusing to me, but tunnel=building_passage seems to be a > better one than covered=yes for the situations when a highway is under a > building. I think ideally such a building should be split giving the > building a different layer than the highway. Strange enough the wiki > says'' *The > layer has to be the same as the building*.' Too bad JOSM keeps displaying > validator warnings for these situations.
regarding "*The layer has to be the same as the building*" it is correct. The way can not be at a different layer than the building and at the same time pass through it. Different layers are posssible with "covered=yes" Otherwise I agree covered=building_passage is more precise for many cases but covered still seems better for other cases: * service roads passing under an extended roof of a gas station * situations where the details are not exactly known * waterway passing through some building complex, I would hesitate to call that building_passage Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
