On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:38 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
1. noexit cannot be used on ways because that does not show what end
cannot pass
eeh, what what end ? Either the highway line is linked to another highway
at both ends, then noexit is a tagging mistake. Or the
2014-04-09 10:47 GMT+02:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:38 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.comwrote:
1. noexit cannot be used on ways because that does not show what end
cannot pass
eeh, what what end ? Either the highway line is linked to another
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Ronnie Soak
chaoschaos0...@googlemail.com wrote:
There can be a way that IS connected on both ends and still is a dead end. A
road can end in a wall or a fence, where on the other side the road
continues.
There may be other tags there (barrier=*), but still it
There can be a way that IS connected on both ends and still is a dead
end. A
road can end in a wall or a fence, where on the other side the road
continues.
There may be other tags there (barrier=*), but still it would be hard to
quickly spot the dead end side with noexit=yes tagged only
On 4/9/14 8:51 AM, Ronnie Soak wrote:
As a means to communicate an intention from one mapper to the next, it
simply is more clear when mapped on the node than on the way. I simply
gave an example where the end of the dead-end way can not simply be
deduced by its geometry. Regards, chaos
i
On 9 April 2014 14:05, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
what makes no_exit so special that it needs its own key
for this purpose?
Roads that are close to each other but not connected are a common tagging
mistake. The tag no_exit is a default, which we generally don't tag, but I
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
what makes no_exit so special that it needs its own key
for this purpose?
Once more, it's only useful for QA tools checking highway
intersections geometry where one of the highway is nearby but not
connected. The
Am 09.04.2014 14:51, schrieb Ronnie Soak:
There can be a way that IS connected on both ends and still is a
dead end. A
road can end in a wall or a fence, where on the other side the road
continues.
There may be other tags there (barrier=*), but still it would be
On 4/9/14 9:13 AM, Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
what makes no_exit so special that it needs its own key
for this purpose?
Once more, it's only useful for QA tools checking highway
intersections geometry where one of the highway is
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
but when do you remove the no_exit, or do you leave it forever for
the validators? the DB developer in me doesn't like redundant
information, all it does is create confusion if the data is in
conflict.
It's only
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Florian Schäfer flor...@schaeferban.de wrote:
An example where the tagging of noexit on ways is not sufficient is a
T-shaped deadend, where the crossbar is one OSM-way. At one end pedestrians
can pass, at the other end not.
Again, the noexit is only important
Am 09.04.2014 16:04, schrieb Pieren:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Florian Schäfer flor...@schaeferban.de wrote:
An example where the tagging of noexit on ways is not sufficient is a
T-shaped deadend, where the crossbar is one OSM-way. At one end pedestrians
can pass, at the other end not.
On 2014-04-09 10:47, Pieren wrote :
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:38 PM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
1. noexit cannot be used on ways because that does not show what
end cannot pass
eeh, what what end ? Either the highway line is
On 08.04.2014 11:19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014-04-07 22:11 GMT+02:00 Robin `ypid` Schneider ypi...@aol.de:
I created two proposals for which the time to vote is over but there are no
votes :(. Should we open the voting once again or what is the usual
procedure in
such a case? The
On 07.04.2014 22:34, Stephan Knauss wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 07.04.2014 22:11, Robin `ypid` Schneider wrote:
I created two proposals for which the time to vote is over but there are no
votes :(. Should we open the voting once again or what is the usual
procedure in
such a case? The proposals
15 matches
Mail list logo
