On Apr 13, 2014, at 11:28 PM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
> Agree partly. It's not meaningless, but it get's ambiguous very often.
> Take traffic signals as one example where the direction might be used:
> Besides an intersection someone could add the traffic lights on the four
> individual ways (instea
Am 14.04.2014 14:07, schrieb André Pirard:
> Hi,
>
> Side note: Please note that I just found two versions of the "Use the
> noexit=yes tag..." text. One ahead that says that it must be used only
> on nodes and the former one inside that says that it can be used on ways
> too. I left the newcomer
Hi,
Side note: Please note that I just found two versions of the "Use
the noexit=yes tag..." text. One ahead that says that it must be
used only on nodes and the former one inside that says that it can
be used on ways too. I left the newcomer where it was: ahead but
Am 13.04.2014 22:36, schrieb Mike N:
> On 4/13/2014 4:21 PM, Pieren wrote:
>> It's just a long and onerous discussion to find dubious arguments
>> against this tag on ways.
>
> It's really an argument against needless clutter in the Wiki. Why not
> add noexit to a relation to show some conditio
>
> To make it less ambiguous and easier I would deprecate forward/backward
> completely for nodes and advice to use cardinal coordinates for all nodes.
I think that would be ok for traffic_sign:direction=*,
but not for traffic_signals:direction=* or direction=* when used with
highway=stop/give_wa
Am 14.04.2014 08:28, schrieb Peter Wendorff:
> Hi,
>
> Am 13.04.2014 21:35, schrieb Steve Doerr:
>> I'm surprised that so many people are jumping to this conclusion. Let's
>> remember that a way is just a series of nodes in a particular order. So
>> a node is not necessarily an isolated object.
>
2014-04-14 12:15 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
>
> sorry, if I come up a little late with this, and maybe it was already
> mentioned by someone, actually, "drinking_water" and "drinkable" are not
> exactly the same. If something is "drinking_water" I'd expect it to be
> monitored and "certified"
2014-04-02 22:18 GMT+02:00 Rudolf Martin :
> We can transfer "drinkable=" to "drinking_water=". The future tagging-
> scheme will have only one tag to indicate the existence and quality of
> drinking water.
>
> In the future the tag "drinkable=" can be deprecated.
>
sorry, if I come up a little