On 05.02.15 06:44, Andreas Labres wrote:
Would it be O.K. to add route=running to the Wiki?
I'd also need a value for nordic walking routes, could this be
route=nordic_walking?
Here is an example of the signpost for a running and a walking route:
On 2015-02-12 05:28, Marc Gemis wrote :
The Nominatim FAQ [1] mentions 2 sources [2], [3] to report problems
and it also has the text You can also contact the developers on IRC
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC on channel #osm-nominatim.
Is there a seasonal difference in the routes?
--
Tagging winter only routes makes a sense:
Then there may be prohibitions on uses, e.g. closed to walkers, closed to
snowshoes, designated for skate skiing, etc.
Then there could be summer only routes similarly restricted with access
tags:
2015-01-03 16:28 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
Landuse=religious AFAIK started being used for land that is owned by a
religious entity, and in it there would be schools, playgrounds, priest
living grounds, and so on. Then this was disputed
+1, religious really isn't a _landuse_
2015-02-09 8:42 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:
We need to be able to map partially enclosed courtyards as well, e.g.:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/48.17839/16.34189
(The courtyards are named Hof 1 ... Hof 7.)
+1
it really shouldn't matter, we can always draw an area.
On 12/02/2015 5:38 PM, johnw wrote:
tepid and mild are synonyms, so tepid should cover mild in that way. usually
tepid is for liquids, and mild is for air / weather, when it comes to
temperature, AFAIK.
Is ambient is for the ambient air/weather, ambient ground temp, or ambient
material
I'm sorry to say, I sort of dropped out of the discussion when the small
changes to camp_site we started with evolved into the current one. My
mapping chores here in Thailand are so much more basic than the degree of
specification you're talking about. Here you're lucky to find a
waste_basket to
Warin, others, no further thoughts on a new high level tag indicating
rubbish disposal facilities ?
Background is that this came up while tagging campsite but its potential
use is far greater. We have many high level tags and most relate to
activity that generates rubbish, lets deal with it !
To
On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 11:16 +1100, Warin wrote:
.
I'd split the voting up into
.
waste, collection is the more frequent case.
waste_collection
Agreed, you said that in your previous note but it slipped my mind by
time I responded. Sigh ...
When you say, split the voting, are
On 14/02/2015 11:43 AM, David Bannon wrote:
On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 11:16 +1100, Warin wrote:
.
I'd split the voting up into
.
waste, collection is the more frequent case.
waste_collection
Agreed, you said that in your previous note but it slipped my mind by
time I responded. Sigh
OK folks, here it really is ! A small group have identified a need for
a new high level tag, waste_collection=
Likely values to be identified in a latter and separate process. Not
unlike those used for waste=, a subtag of amenity=waste_disposal;waste=*
The background is that while we started
On 14/02/2015 11:02 AM, David Bannon wrote:
Warin, others, no further thoughts on a new high level tag indicating
rubbish disposal facilities ?
Background is that this came up while tagging campsite but its potential
use is far greater. We have many high level tags and most relate to
activity
On 09.02.2015 16:01, Stephen Gower wrote:
Here in Oxford (where we have many examples of named quadrangles/courtyards)
I see examples where they are tagged as highway=footway areas (e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301895528 ) but more often the central
section of lawn has been named
I think amenity=waste_disposal with sub tags for the type of waste being
disposed of could be a workable solution. It's more complicated than using
another top level tag like dump_station, etc., for sewage but allows for
more specificity when desired. This seems to be a good, general purpose,
top
On 13.02.15 14:04, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Is there a seasonal difference in the routes?
Absolutely. This has nothing to do with each other. Of course, a cross-country
skiing track is lead along what is a forestry track in summer or so. But that's
what a route relation is good for. But the
Hello.
The english wiki page key:building says that this key may not be used
on nodes. However, most (but not all) of the english wiki pages for
the individual values (like building=apartments) allow the usage on
nodes.
I’m not sure if it is useful to have a different policy for different
values
16 matches
Mail list logo
