[Tagging] Opening hours + daylight saving time

2015-11-14 Thread Warin
Hi, I need to combine daylight saving times with opening hours ... For example open 8:300 to 17:00, except for daylight saving times where it is open 8:30 to 18:00. Possible ? opening_hours=ndst 8:30-17:00; dst 8:30-18:00 where ndst = non daylight saving time dst = daylight saving time dst

Re: [Tagging] Opening hours + daylight saving time

2015-11-14 Thread Robin Schneider
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 14.11.2015 09:15, Warin wrote: > Hi, > > I need to combine daylight saving times with opening hours ... For example > open 8:300 to 17:00, except for daylight saving times where it is open 8:30 > to 18:00. > > > Possible ? opening_hours=ndst

Re: [Tagging] Named junctions

2015-11-14 Thread johnw
> On Nov 13, 2015, at 7:46 PM, tomoya muramoto wrote: > > Severe problem: Different names I did a quick look around, and this signal-grid naming issue seems to be pretty big, but only in Hokkaido. I never noticed this, as I have not been to Hokkaido yet. several

Re: [Tagging] RFC - Level:ref=*

2015-11-14 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 14.11.2015 07:17, johnw wrote: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/level:ref Thanks for the proposal! One question though: What's the rationale for calling it level:ref, rather than level:name? ___ Tagging mailing list

[Tagging] Friendliness with attacked mapped places in Paris

2015-11-14 Thread André Pirard
Hi, OpenstreetMap often extends friendliness by humanitarian tagging. In this case of desolation, there is little to tag. Little... Wikipedia have been extremely fast in all languages !!! After some mourning period, the note below may

Re: [Tagging] Friendliness with attacked mapped places in Paris

2015-11-14 Thread Frederik Ramm
André, OSM is not a place for condolences in note tags. I'm sorry if this sounds harsh but sticking to facts is what keeps most conflicts out of OSM - if something is observable on the ground, we map it, and if not, we (mostly) don't. Emotions are one such thing we don't map. Yes, a tragedy

Re: [Tagging] Friendliness with attacked mapped places in Paris

2015-11-14 Thread jonathan
+1 Frederik http://bigfatfrog67.me On 14/11/2015 18:35, Frederik Ramm wrote: André, OSM is not a place for condolences in note tags. I'm sorry if this sounds harsh but sticking to facts is what keeps most conflicts out of OSM - if something is observable on the ground, we map it, and if

Re: [Tagging] Opening hours + daylight saving time

2015-11-14 Thread Warin
On 14/11/2015 9:03 PM, Robin Schneider wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 14.11.2015 09:15, Warin wrote: Hi, I need to combine daylight saving times with opening hours ... For example open 8:300 to 17:00, except for daylight saving times where it is open 8:30 to 18:00.

Re: [Tagging] Friendliness with attacked mapped places in Paris

2015-11-14 Thread Warin
On 15/11/2015 10:23 AM, jonathan wrote: +1 Frederik http://bigfatfrog67.me On 14/11/2015 18:35, Frederik Ramm wrote: André, OSM is not a place for condolences in note tags. I'm sorry if this sounds harsh but sticking to facts is what keeps most conflicts out of OSM - if something is

Re: [Tagging] Friendliness with attacked mapped places in Paris

2015-11-14 Thread johnw
> On Nov 15, 2015, at 3:35 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > Yes, a tragedy has happened, or more precisely a horrific crime; and > yes, you and I and many others wish to extend our hearfelt condolences > to the victims and their families. But OpenStreetMap is not the right >

Re: [Tagging] RFC - Level:ref=*

2015-11-14 Thread johnw
> On Nov 15, 2015, at 12:48 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > > On 14.11.2015 07:17, johnw wrote: >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/level:ref > > Thanks for the proposal! One question though: What's the rationale for > calling it level:ref, rather than

Re: [Tagging] Friendliness with attacked mapped places in Paris

2015-11-14 Thread André Pirard
On 2015-11-14 19:35, Frederik Ramm wrote : > André, > >OSM is not a place for condolences in note tags. > > I'm sorry if this sounds harsh but sticking to facts is what keeps most > conflicts out of OSM - if something is observable on the ground, we map > it, and if not, we (mostly) don't. > >