On 21-11-16 09:02, joost schouppe wrote:
Upon further thought on this subject which doubtlessly keeps all of you
out of your sleep, here's a short analysis with my conclusion:
dog_toilet:
plus: it is very clear what it means, even for non-native speakers
min: * we would need cat_toilet,
-Original Message-
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 6:39 PM
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Proper way to tag highways located in "dangerous" areas
Hi,
On 11/17/2016 08:42 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I don't think it's
On 21.11.2016 09:02, joost schouppe wrote:
> So I would like to propose a completely new value: amenity=pet_toilet.
> It is as descriptive as the best here, but easily expandable. It is a place
> where pets go to the toilet. Obviously they don't have a sit-down toilet.
> But "going to the toilet"
I am not convinced we will need a lot of other values for specific animals
in the context of amenity=pet_toilet.
Things can always be structured into more generic main tags and additional
subtags (without which the main tag does not make sufficient sense to
understand the thing). E.g. we could
Upon further thought on this subject which doubtlessly keeps all of you out
of your sleep, here's a short analysis with my conclusion:
dog_toilet:
plus: it is very clear what it means, even for non-native speakers
min: * we would need cat_toilet, hamster_toilet etc over time.
* technically, a
