[Tagging] Extremely complicated conditional values

Is there a condition value calculator that can help me come up with sane tagging for this? https://openstreetcam.org/details/955279/18672/track-info This is a chart of advised speeds in MPH for HGVs on a motorway in Oregon based on weight in pounds. I'm at a complete loss of how to tag for this

[Tagging] RFC - livestock_dip

Hi, I have made some changes and advanced https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/livestock_dip to status proposed. 2 Problems I have with it .. Type of dip Rather than use livestock_dip

Re: [Tagging] Why should we avoid overusage of amenity=* tag?

On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 23:07, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The same can be said for a pub, restaurant, etc. > They are all commercial enterprises, if they did not make money they > would not exist. > There 'service' to the community is there to help them make money. > Mostly,

Re: [Tagging] Why should we avoid overusage of amenity=* tag?

On 25/04/19 04:39, Dave F wrote: On 21/04/2019 01:12, Warin wrote: I am all for the introduction of the key education=* It makes sense, adds detail - improves the map data base. True. The one that irks me is amenity=cafe. It isn't there for the benefit of the community; it is a

Re: [Tagging] Comments on documenting winter speed limits tagging

On 04.04.19 13:33, Jyri-Petteri Paloposki wrote: > The feedback was quite limited and you or anyone else expressed no > definite stance against documenting the current practice. At least in my case, that's because I expected my mail to be a contribution to a discussion that would (hopefully) end

Re: [Tagging] Incorrectly tagging locks on rivers as canals

Hi Dave I'm happy to tag as canal the man_made space between two lock gates. This is often concrete lined and sized accordingly to allow boats to pass through. The main difference with rivers going through cities is it's often the original natural course. A canal is built by man, Thames river

[Tagging] Incorrectly tagging locks on rivers as canals

Hi This maybe UK specific but it's a tagging problem & maybe wider spread. To allow navigation, rivers occasional have lock gates, usually as a separate channel. Some contributors tag these incorrectly as waterway=canal for the centre line. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/347369154

Re: [Tagging] Why should we avoid overusage of amenity=* tag?

On 21/04/2019 01:12, Warin wrote: I am all for the introduction of the key education=* It makes sense, adds detail - improves the map data base. True. The one that irks me is amenity=cafe. It isn't there for the benefit of the community; it is a commercial enterprise & should be tagged

Re: [Tagging] Why should we avoid overusage of amenity=* tag?

To your 4.: We need to get the developers to change their presets beforehand. Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] Why should we avoid overusage of amenity=* tag?From: Paul Allen To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" CC: On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 10:16, Valor Naram

Re: [Tagging] Why should we avoid overusage of amenity=* tag?

On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 10:16, Valor Naram wrote: > > Deprecating "amenity" would hurt because it's a very important key. But I > have some suggestions: > There are cases where amenity is an appropriate tag. Such as for amenities. 1. Keeping the "amenity" wiki page intact. > 2.

Re: [Tagging] Why should we avoid overusage of amenity=* tag?

Good reasons were given here. I changed also my mind but there's the problem of how to deal with this problem.Deprecating "amenity" would hurt because it's a very important key. But I have some suggestions:1. Keeping the "amenity" wiki page intact.2. Creating/extending pages for new keys e.g.

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Landcover barren

Hi everyone, Since there is no more open discussion around this tag, we decide to pass to the voting phase. We are waiting for your opinions. This is inside the project about mapping deforestation from PoliMappers and