Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - waterway=tidal_channel

I would appreciate help with the description and definition for tidal channels: aka tidal creeks, sloughs, pills, usually located in salt marshes, tidal flats or mangroves. Right now the short description is: "A natural intertidal waterway in mangroves, salt marshes and tidal flats with water flo

Re: [Tagging] Marking legal BBQ locations

16 Jun 2019, 03:33 by graemefi...@gmail.com: > > > On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 21:13, Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoni...@tutanota.com > > > wrote: > >> How to mark locations where grilling is legal, >> but one needs bring own grill? >> > > leisure=firepit perhaps? > Thi

Re: [Tagging] Marking legal BBQ locations

> On Jun 16, 2019, at 10:33 AM, Graeme Fitzpatrick > wrote: > > leisure=firepit perhaps? A fire pit is a physical object, often at beaches, where open fire is allowed inside a very large 1x1 or 2x2 m concrete box. They are usually not used for cooking, but rather sitting around at night for

Re: [Tagging] Marking legal BBQ locations

I think "bring_own_bbq=yes" is sensible; "bbq=designated" is a little confusing, but probably also correct. The tag leisure=firepit is for a structure or spot designated for open fires, such as a fire ring made of stones or bricks, or a metal fire pit. I checked the page for amenity=bbq and notic

Re: [Tagging] Marking legal BBQ locations

On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 21:13, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > How to mark locations where grilling is legal, > but one needs bring own grill? > leisure=firepit perhaps? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfirepit Thanks Graeme ___ Tagging m

Re: [Tagging] lanes = 0

sent from a phone > On 15. Jun 2019, at 01:10, Joseph Eisenberg > wrote: > > This requirement is fine for Europe, but the presence of lane markings > is not reliable in all of the world. > > In developing countries, such as here in Indonesia, the presence of > painted lane markings is incons

Re: [Tagging] Deprecation howto [was: Deprecation of non-approved values for diplomatic=?]

Hello Frederik, Le 15.06.19 à 12:28, Frederik Ramm a écrit : > On 6/14/19 5:49 PM, marc marc wrote: >> I think the proposals for a new tag should clearly say: >> - add such tag >> - edit the old tag description to point the new tag >> - write to editors to adapt presets >> - propose a mecanical ed

Re: [Tagging] Marking legal BBQ locations

Note that =designated is used but only in cases where objects were built for this usage. For example there are some objects officially marked as combined footway/cycleway that were not built or even suitable as a cycleway. Correct tagging for that case is stillbicycle=designated foot=designated 15

Re: [Tagging] lanes = 0

On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 12:00:19AM +0200, Allroads wrote: > First, the consensus in OSM is Sorry, but this thread is clear evidence that statement is false. And existing mapping also contradicts it. ael ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreet

Re: [Tagging] Marking legal BBQ locations

Le 15.06.19 à 13:09, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > How to mark locations where grilling is legal, > but one needs bring own grill? bbq=limited > bbq=designated as designated is often "yes and build for this usage", I find it unsuitable ___ Tagging mail

[Tagging] Marking legal BBQ locations

How to mark locations where grilling is legal, but one needs bring own grill? amenity=bbq is not fitting, as it for tagging a permanently present grill In one specific case there is a permanent table, chairs, waste bin for ashes etc So this place qualifies as tourism=picnic_site, but I want to al

Re: [Tagging] lanes = 0

14 Jun 2019, 13:04 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > 1. Allroads did not favour nolanes=yes because it is a double negative > I agree, this is a bit overcomplicated. > 2. lanes=no is not so good because there are people who estimate the lanes > value if no markings are present (see ael's message).

Re: [Tagging] Ho to tag the position of objects on highways

For things like manhole or poles, i just tag them at their real position, as it is not useful to connect them to the highway line which exist mostly for routing purpose. There are a lot of object that can exist on the area of a road (a pole, a manhole, a barrier, an underground fire hydrant,...) so

Re: [Tagging] Deprecation of non-approved values for diplomatic=?

Hi, On 6/14/19 5:49 PM, marc marc wrote: > I think the proposals for a new tag should clearly say: > - add such tag > - edit the old tag description to point the new tag > - write to editors to adapt presets > - propose a mecanical edit, if necessary by splitting it up > to avoid a global opponent