Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v3

Hi all, It is good to see active conversations on improving mapping of public transport. Many thanks for your proposal John and Stereo! Reading through it, I appreciate it being quite short. And I like the idea of optional route ways. However, I disagree on deprecating them entirely. There are go

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v3

This is how I would map a solitary tram stop: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/611673223 Disregard the public_transport=platform, tram=yes. If I were mapping it fresh today, I might not add those tags anymore. Also note the pt=stop_position

Re: [Tagging] Add man_made=goods_conveyor to Map Features or vote on the proposal first?

On 3/12/20 1:37 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote: Just a quick question. Is it reasonable to support `oneway=no`? I know of one that serves a lime kiln that hauls coal one way and cement the other. The discussion on the WIki states, "I think that virtually all conveyors are unidirectional, and this calls f

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v3

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 4:20 AM Jarek Piórkowski wrote: > On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 23:09, Joseph Eisenberg > wrote: > > > In inclement weather, passengers may well be found waiting in > > the transit shelter 8 metres to west, and the tram will stop for them > > if they are waiting in the shelter.

Re: [Tagging] Add man_made=goods_conveyor to Map Features or vote on the proposal first?

sent from a phone > On 12. Mar 2020, at 01:38, Kevin Kenny wrote: > > Just a quick question. Is it reasonable to support `oneway=no`? I know > of one that serves a lime kiln that hauls coal one way and cement the > other. is this at the same time/ parallel, or reversing? If it is the former