On 4/15/20 22:03, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> But as an English speaker, I find it difficult to immediately
> understand the meaning of foot:backward=no (which uses a double
> negative, as it were), while oneway:foot=yes seems clear right away.
>
> Is there really a reason to prefer the less common
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 13:04, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> But as an English speaker, I find it difficult to immediately
> understand the meaning of foot:backward=no (which uses a double
> negative, as it were), while oneway:foot=yes seems clear right away.
>
As another native English speaker,
To sidestep your question, oneway=yes on a highway=footway, cycleway or
path already implies it's not accessible to vehicles so a oneway tag on any
of those highway tags should apply to all modes of transport. So
highway=footway + oneway=yes shouldn't need any other tags like oneway:foot.
On Thu,
Some paths and footways have oneway=yes. Sometimes this means that
bicycles may only access these features in one direction, but other
times it has been used for one-way features for pedestrians (for
example, queues in theme parks or at border control stations).
Other more specific tags have been
On 15/04/2020 09:27, John Willis via Tagging wrote:
On Apr 15, 2020, at 8:34 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
The traffic lights control the junction
We have a lot of traffic light controlled crossings in Japan that are
just for a crosswalk, while the smaller intersecting road is stop-sign
controlled
On 15/04/2020 05:33, lukas-...@web.de wrote:
Okay, so this is what I think, too and maybe I would clarify this in the
wiki then.
But I think in some cases it still wouldn't be clear, because what would
be about mapping this then:
On 16/4/20 1:23 am, Manon Viou wrote:
Thanks Martin, yes, refugee sites should always be temporary even if,
as you said, some turn to be very long term places. That's why we do
not suggest to add temporary/permanent options.
Manon
In which case the description for amenity=social_facility +
Am Mi., 15. Apr. 2020 um 17:37 Uhr schrieb Manon Viou :
> Hello again Martin,
> I agree large and small are quite relative concepts, I proposed to set a
> threshold to "less than 5 buildings" because it was the easiest way I
> found. I'm not sure counting people is feasible at least for remote
Am Mi., 15. Apr. 2020 um 16:05 Uhr schrieb Frederik Ramm <
frede...@remote.org>:
> and a proper staffed office in a city. These sales representatives are
> usually self-employed and get a kickback from every contract they sell.
indeed, it wouldn't even be important where they are, because you
Am Mi., 15. Apr. 2020 um 15:55 Uhr schrieb Greg Troxel :
> If there is a preset for "insurance" and a subtype for what kind, I
> think most people would complete their tagging in seconds. And this is
> something that isn't super common, and many people mapping it will be
> tagging one, very
Hello again Martin,
I agree large and small are quite relative concepts, I proposed to set a threshold to "less than 5 buildings" because it was the easiest way I found. I'm not sure counting people is feasible at least for remote mapping or data integration from NGO or other
Thanks Martin, yes, refugee sites should always be temporary even if, as you said, some turn to be very long term places. That's why we do not suggest to add temporary/permanent options.
Manon
Le 15 avril 2020 à 11:36, Martin Koppenhoefer <
Hi,
On 15.04.20 03:16, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> OK, but are there any countries in the world where you can would
> normally buy health insurance in the same place as car or home or life
> insurance?
Yes, sure. Many big German insurers offer health insurance and other
insurances (e.g. life, car,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 14:55, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> If there is a preset for "insurance" and a subtype for what kind, I
> think most people would complete their tagging in seconds. And this is
> something that isn't super common, and many people mapping it will be
> tagging one, very
On 2020-04-14 21:16, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
OK, but are there any countries in the world where you can would
normally buy health insurance in the same place as car or home or life
insurance?
I don't know. Many countries might not even allow this.
If not, then this is a theoretical problem
Maybe there would be some reason th change the proposal on tagging traffic_signals=crossing_only to make it more clear in teh value that only those traffic lights are meant with it, which do control only a crossing. But if that would be a solution at all, I don't really know. Because I think there
> On Apr 15, 2020, at 8:34 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> The traffic lights control the junction
We have a lot of traffic light controlled crossings in Japan that are just for
a crosswalk, while the smaller intersecting road is stop-sign controlled for
cars. Only the crosswalk is controlled by
Voting is now open for the tag amenity=motorcycle_taxi:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:amenity%3Dmotorcycle_taxi
"Use amenity=motorcycle_taxi for the location of a motorcycle taxi
stand, a place where motorcycle taxi drivers wait for passengers."
In many countries in
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 10:36, wrote:
> Which was mentioned a few posts before? The traffic lights control the
> junction, but people might say that the same one single traffic light is
> controlling the pedestrian crossing and the junction...
>
I would say that it is controlling the crossing
sent from a phone
> On 15. Apr 2020, at 10:17, Manon Viou wrote:
>
> amenity=refugee_site and amenity=social_facility + social_facility=shelter.
> amenity=refugee_site is for large refugee site
> amenity=social_facility and social_facility=shelter is f or small refugee
> site (less than 5
sent from a phone
> On 15. Apr 2020, at 01:13, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would think amenity=refugee_site is an area set aside for the non-temporary
> residential use of refugees
maybe I’m a dreamer, but I would expect all refugee related features to be
“temporary”, even
Okay, so this is what I think, too and maybe I would clarify this in the wiki then.
But I think in some cases it still wouldn't be clear, because what would be about mapping this then:
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@52.0898304,-4.6450624,3a,75y,122.71h,87.75t/data="">
Which was mentioned
"I am still not completely sure, but I believe, "Allianz" is a group
here, and health care insurance will be provided by a member of this
group, and agents will sell you any product the group offers (i.e. in
the details they are different "companies", but you can find several
of these companies
sent from a phone
> On 15. Apr 2020, at 03:17, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> But it takes more time for each mapper to add 2 tags instead of one.
> Mapper time is the most precious resource in OpenStreetMap: we don't
> have enough mappers, and most are working for free, for fun.
> Let's make
Hello Warin,
the description does ditinguish amenity=refugee_site and amenity=social_facility + social_facility=shelter.
amenity=refugee_site is
for large refugee site
amenity=social_facility and social_facility=shelter is f
or small refugee site (less
25 matches
Mail list logo
