Martin Koppenhoefer:
> I think we can assume that a line of trees in the middle is sufficient to
> make mappers use 2 highways instead of 1!? How can we distinguish between
> the following sections
> tree - road - tree - road - tree
> and
> tree - road - tree - tree - road - tree
> and
> tree -
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 18:12, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 17:05, Steve Doerr wrote:
>
>> On 12/08/2020 19:27, Paul Allen wrote:
>>
>>
> I would interpret 'Collects', 'Issues', 'Spreads', and possibly 'Sinks' as
>> verbs in the third person singular, rather than plural nouns.
>>
>
sent from a phone
> On 16. Aug 2020, at 01:06, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> I'd leave it up to his listed website, &, if necessary, his receptionist :-)
or just the name, people could google for the website ;-)
Seriously, I am in favor of adding such detail in a semantic way. If we all do
sent from a phone
> On 16. Aug 2020, at 01:06, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> Having said that, though, I'd also agree with you that lice is a "health"
> issue, so healthcare= seems a better option.
+1, while not actually dangerous in most cases (transmission of other diseases
is possible
On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 06:16, Lisbeth Salander wrote:
> The only reason I even proposed healthcare is because, well, it *is* a
> hygiene and health problem... and both amenity and shop seemed too
> generic.
>
I did just have a thought, remembering that a while ago a new tag went
through for the
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2020, at 17:31, Peter Elderson wrote:
>
> a continuous line of evenly spaced trees at both sides, sometimes also in the
> middle, sometimes double or triple rows at each side, often with a separately
> lined cycleway and tree_lined ditches.
thank you for
Hi all,
I'd like to revive an old proposal, namely the "*Green alley*".
Description:
A green alley is a service alley that a group of local residents embellish
with vegetation, such as trees, vines and flowers. This collective effort
results in a better quality of life for residents in addition
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2020, at 17:33, Arne Johannessen wrote:
>
> Therefore, the tunnel's name is the primary name for that particular way, and
> thus belongs into the name=* tag.
>
> The full name tagging for a road tunnel should usually look like this:
>
> name=The Tunnel
>
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2020, at 19:12, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> If we decide that
> we want to tag such things in the first place.
as there was significant discussion how to tag them, it doesn’t seem that not
mapping them is an option we still have to discuss
Cheers Martin
On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Paul Allen wrote:
Yeah, we try to avoid putting two top-level tags on the same object
because
of nasal demons: http://catb.org/jargon/html/N/nasal-demons.html
That's awfully pessimistic, but I see your point. I suppose having some
hairdressers rendered as generic
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 17:05, Steve Doerr wrote:
> On 12/08/2020 19:27, Paul Allen wrote:
>
>
I would interpret 'Collects', 'Issues', 'Spreads', and possibly 'Sinks' as
> verbs in the third person singular, rather than plural nouns.
>
That's a bit of an issue, although I think you've included
Had a look at http://www.skilifts.org/old/glossary.htm, came up with :
Aerialway:station=top_terminal, mid_terminal, bottom_terminal
Yves
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 12/08/2020 19:27, Paul Allen wrote:
e source of a river is defined by one of the following terms:
Collects- where the source is a bog or a marsh
Spring- where the source is a natural spring
Issues- where the source is an emission from an agricultural drain, or
where the streamre-emerges from
Interesting:
https://pistetopowder.com/the-new-schindlergratbahn-lift/
Quote:
Facts & Figures
Bottom station: 2,035 m
Middle station: 2,643 m
Mountain station: 2,579
OK, maybe 'head' is not ideal, but I think it's worth to find something else
than 'upper'
Yves
Le 15 août 2020 13:37:31
dktue wrote:
> Am 15.08.2020 um 11:18 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>> [...] For all of our common usecases, mapping the way through the tunnel and
>> indicating it is inside a tunnel is sufficient, that’s why we do not map
>> them in greater detail so far). An implicit tunnel is considered
Nederland has an awful lot of ways, waterways, railways, rivers, parkings,
churchyards, and other linear and area features which are lined with a row
of trees. And if I say a row of trees, think of 10 Km almost straight with
a continuous line of evenly spaced trees at both sides, sometimes also in
Am 15.08.2020 um 15:31 schrieb Colin Smale:
On 2020-08-15 15:15, dktue wrote:
The main thing is that people often refer to "Talstation" and
"Bergstation" but this information is not machine-readeable but
mostly encoded in the names of the stations. My goal ist to make this
machine-readeable
sent from a phone
>> On 15. Aug 2020, at 13:47, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
>> wrote:
> I oppose such potential removal
here is an example:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways
this is maybe not bad as a general overview, but then it duplicates significant
part of the information
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2020, at 13:47, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> I oppose such potential removal
referring to which page?
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 02:36, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
> One question I have on this is how much are the OS maps tailored to the UK
> environment?
>
The OS maps of the UK are very much tailored to the UK environment. I
don't know if they are, or ever were, responsible for mapping portions of
the
On 2020-08-15 15:15, dktue wrote:
> The main thing is that people often refer to "Talstation" and "Bergstation"
> but this information is not machine-readeable but mostly encoded in the names
> of the stations. My goal ist to make this machine-readeable because it almost
> all cases people can
The main thing is that people often refer to "Talstation" and
"Bergstation" but this information is not machine-readeable but mostly
encoded in the names of the stations. My goal ist to make this
machine-readeable because it almost all cases people can refer to it
even if they do not know the
It seems we can't even agree on what question to ask an "expert". @dktue
I think you started this discussion... What was your intention at the
time? Was it "how do we identify top/bottom stations on a cable car"? If
you ask an "expert" you might get an answer involving the project
numbers for the
Maybe (as always here) we are too few specialists on this list to find the
right values. I know of two forum funivie.org and remontées-mécaniques.net that
specialize in the field, but in Italian and French. Does anybody know of a
similar community, but English speaking?
Maybe we could have good
For me both schemes would be fine. I have no problem using "lower",
"upper" and "mid" even if the upper station is lower than some mid
stations. The definition from the wiki will then still explain how to
tag it and it's a rare case where the mapper probably will look for the
definition in the
Yes, I object to the specific values, as I (and others) said earlier.
The use of "base" and "head" is not intuitive and will lead to confusion
and errors amongst non-fluent English speakers. More basic words like
"top" and "bottom", or maybe "upper" and "lower", are preferable.
You can/should
As long as it explicitly notes that
name and tunnel:name may be the same
I am ok with that
15 Aug 2020, 12:19 by em...@daniel-korn.de:
> Am 15.08.2020 um 11:18 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
>> IMHO a tunnel is more than the way through it, the ventilation shafts,
>> escape ways, also arguably
I oppose such potential removal
15 Aug 2020, 12:47 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 15. Aug 2020, at 07:32, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> would suggest to create a single wiki page for tree-lined road mapping, so
>> that we have one place where we describe the three
To make in unambiguous, the definition would then be:
aerialway:station=base
for the station at an end of the aerialway with the lower altitude,
aerialway:station=head
for the station at the opposite end of the aerialway (hence with a
higher altitude) and
aerialway:station=mid
Hi,
it was mentioned, we have many aerialways in Tyrol and there are really
cases where the mid station is the one with the highest altitude.
I found an example ("Schindlergratbahn", base 2035 m, mid 2643 m , head
2579 m, see link ). So i think, the second scheme with base, mid, head
could
be
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2020, at 07:32, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> would suggest to create a single wiki page for tree-lined road mapping, so
> that we have one place where we describe the three different approaches for
> mapping them.
we have one place (the wiki) and the possible
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2020, at 07:32, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> I do see these issues with adding sidewalks and cycle paths, where we have a
> similar choice between mapping as separate objects or as road property.
it is often perceived as an either or choice, but there is no
Am 15.08.2020 um 11:18 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
IMHO a tunnel is more than the way through it, the ventilation shafts, escape
ways, also arguably all the tubes, could be considered „the tunnel“. The reason
it is not done typically is that these features aren’t very visible (mostly
sent from a phone
> On 15. Aug 2020, at 01:21, Arne Johannessen wrote:
>
> That's precisely why man_made=tunnel is so rare.
IMHO a tunnel is more than the way through it, the ventilation shafts, escape
ways, also arguably all the tubes, could be considered „the tunnel“. The reason
it is
34 matches
Mail list logo
