Re: [Tagging] RFC - Proposed features/emergency=lifeboat station

2022-11-23 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 09:29, Andy Townsend wrote: > > Why not both? > Because a boat is a mobile feature, that we don't / can't map? e.g https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=349559642#map=19/-27.42815/153.08582 - we don't try to map the last bus in the middle row as #632 > Taking an

Re: [Tagging] RFC - Proposed features/emergency=lifeboat station

2022-11-23 Thread Andy Townsend
On 23/11/2022 22:23, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: But we're supposed to be tagging the base / buildings, not the boat itself. Why not both? Taking an example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8321217532 * amenity = lifeboat * emergency = marine_rescue * lifeboat = offshore *

Re: [Tagging] RFC - Proposed features/emergency=lifeboat station

2022-11-23 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:12, Jez Nicholson wrote: > > Is amenity=lifeboat actually wrong? > No, not really, but why have amenity=lifeboat & emergency=lifeboat (& sometimes emergency=marine_rescue) both tagged on the same feature? > The ones in the UK at least are actual lifeboats, showing

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

2022-11-23 Thread Minh Nguyen
Vào lúc 10:44 2022-11-23, Zeke Farwell đã viết: A 100+ message thread on the mailing list is no better than on Discourse.  The problem is people spending too much time writing many long messages, and not enough time reading and thinking.  Much as I would love if everyone could learn to write

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

2022-11-23 Thread Zeke Farwell
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 10:57 AM Matija Nalis < mnalis-openstreetmapl...@voyager.hr> wrote: > I find Discourse work well for short discussions (up to max. 10-15 > messages), but becomes totally unusable on > bigger threads esp. with subthreads (e.g. highway=scramble discussion with > 100+

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

2022-11-23 Thread Matija Nalis
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:54:42 -0800, Minh Nguyen wrote: > Vào lúc 17:24 2022-11-19, Matija Nalis đã viết: >> Because, someone has to do that summarizing work for extra channels to make >> sense, and it is IMHO only fair that would >> be proposal author (expecting that EVERYBODY will do that SAME

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

2022-11-23 Thread Matija Nalis
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:01:23 +0100 (CET), Cartographer10 via Tagging wrote: >> Question is: did you then collect all the points those extra communities >> made (both those you agreed with, and those >> that you didn't agree with), and summarized them on wiki /talk page, for >> extra period of

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Start moving proposal announcements to the new forum

2022-11-23 Thread Matija Nalis
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 19:10:07 +0100 (CET), Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: >> the first and foremost reason for the tagging mailing list to exist was the >> desire to offload tagging discussions on a central place, off the other >> channels, because people there felt overwhelmed with the

Re: [Tagging] RFC - Proposed features/emergency=lifeboat station

2022-11-23 Thread Jez Nicholson
Re: deprecating amenity=lifeboat Is amenity=lifeboat actually wrong? The ones in the UK at least are actual lifeboats, showing where they are moored, probably with a lifeboat station nearby. On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 1:00 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Following our previous discussions, I've