On Apr 16, 2023, at 3:10 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> On 16 Apr 2023, at 23:28, Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging
>> wrote:
>> If the operator tag is missing and the owner tag is present, isn't it the
>> general assumption that the owner is also the operator -- i.e. that the
>> owner
I'm mainly focusing on one of the "rules" of OpenStreetMap:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
A scratching or other kind of paintings on walls or public equipments
tend to be temporary. A notable graffiti tends to:
- originate
sent from a phone
> On 16 Apr 2023, at 23:28, Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> If the operator tag is missing and the owner tag is present, isn't it the
> general assumption that the owner is also the operator -- i.e. that the owner
> information is a relevant substitute for the
On Apr 16, 2023, at 2:23 PM, Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging
wrote:
>
> On 16.04.2023 21:40, stevea wrote:
>>> Isn't it a general assumption for everything that the owner is the operator
>>> by default? I'm not saying "isn't it always true", but isn't that generally
>>> the assumption if no
On 16.04.2023 21:40, stevea wrote:
Isn't it a general assumption for everything that the owner is the operator by default?
I'm not saying "isn't it always true", but isn't that generally the assumption
if no other information is presented?
An obviously dangerous slope to slip down here and
stevea writes:
>> What is a point problem?
>
> Mmm, that IS a good question.
Sorry, I meant that the proposal is a point solution, meaning one that
applies to a very narrow view of the problem. Basically I meant what
stevea just said.
___
Tagging
I wish to remain restrained in my reply here.
> Isn't it a general assumption for everything that the owner is the operator
> by default? I'm not saying "isn't it always true", but isn't that generally
> the assumption if no other information is presented?
An obviously dangerous slope to slip
On 16.04.2023 16:55, Greg Troxel wrote:
If we look at this from a data perspective, the most important
information for us to capture /today/ is which public entity type owns
the road and put this in the ownership tag. The specific entity can be
derived geographically with probably 100%
On 4/16/23 ats 19:07, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
IMHO according to the current guidelines not, but they should be amended.
At the moment I am interested exclusively in documenting the use of
'artwork_type=graffiti', a previously undocumented but widely used tag. [1]
Maybe in the future I
Am So., 16. Apr. 2023 um 17:29 Uhr schrieb Daniel Capilla <
dcapil...@gmail.com>:
> On 4/16/23 at 16:13, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > nobody has yet responded to the question about scratchings
>
> The wiki says that "A mural is any piece of artwork painted or applied
> directly on a wall,
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 20:51:57 +0200 (CEST), Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
wrote:
> why only "notable"?
I guess it might be because otherwise one might encourage putting
"tourism=artwork" + "artwork_type=graffiti"
every few meters on any random piece of street furniture, bridge, walls,
subways,
On 4/16/23 at 16:13, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
nobody has yet responded to the question about scratchings
The wiki says that "A mural is any piece of artwork painted or applied
directly on a wall, ceiling or other large permanent surface".
IMHO scratchings could be considered murals
On 4/15/23 at 20:51, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
why only "notable"?
On 4/16/23 at 15:59, António Madeira via Tagging wrote:
I believe it has to do with its longevity and legality. Normally,
notable art works in the streets are allowed by the city authorities
and thus last
I think anything two dimensional on a wall and with the purpose of creating
an art piece is a mural. We can add a new tag like
art_technique=scratching, cleaning, spray_paint, etc.. There is a fuzzy
border into graffiti, where the purpose is for little rebels without a
cause to have their tags be
Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging writes:
> I don't know how this works in other countries. The way it works here
> is that the road owner contracts someone to do stuff, that is, to
> actually go out and put down asphalt, cut vegetation, sweep debris,
> clear snow, fix signage, etc. The road owner
Tod Fitch writes:
> Greg mentions that in his part of the US the government doesn’t own
> the land along the highway. I don’t believe that is true for most of
> the US. The “right of way” includes a lot more land than just where
> the pavement is located. It includes all land that had to be
nobody has yet responded to the question about scratchings, similarly here
is an article about a monumental and recognized artwork created by
cleaning: https://publicdelivery.org/william-kentridge-rome/
The article calls it a "mural" in the title, in osm it wouldn't currently
be, because our
I believe it has to do with its longevity and legality. Normally,
notable art works in the streets are allowed by the city authorities and
thus last longer. Minor graffiti tends to disappear, either by removal
or overlapped by other graffiti/paint/whatever.
Regards,
António.
Às 19:51 de
18 matches
Mail list logo
