[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Markers subjects

2023-04-17 Thread François Lacombe
Dear all, Following a discussion last year about markers subject, particularly pipeline markers, this proposal intends to review the main solution discussed. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Markers_subject_refinement Using subject=* could disambiguate the underground or

Re: [Tagging] openGeoDB* discardable ?

2023-04-17 Thread Kai Michael Poppe
I'd recommend removing all but :loc_id, so that the ID corresponding to the _still_ available recordset on GitLab doesn't get lost. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] openGeoDB* discardable ?

2023-04-17 Thread Illia Marchenko
Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging : > Given how many of them are (<20 000) I think that bot edit removing > them would be a good idea. > Are you suggesting removing all or just some of them? > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - EV Charging Station Mapping

2023-04-17 Thread NKA mapper
Voting has started for the EV Charging Station Mapping proposal. Link to proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/EV_Charging_Station_Mapping Background: Currently, some users create one amenity=charging_station node (or area) to represent a charging location, regardless

Re: [Tagging] openGeoDB* discardable ?

2023-04-17 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Given how many of them are (<20 000) I think that bot edit removing them would be a good idea. I see a point of making tag discardable if there are say 100 000 000 uses of it, but at this volume bot edit seems preferable over slowly removing it over centuries as other edits are being made. Apr

[Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - Public Transport: Auditory Information

2023-04-17 Thread Wieland Breitfeld
Voting has started for Public Transport: Auditory Information. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport:_Auditory_Information ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Difference between graffiti and mural

2023-04-17 Thread Daniel Capilla
On 4/17/23 at 14:26, António Madeira wrote: That's also important, of course, but not everything that exists is or should be mapped. Do you know why circus tents are not mapped, although they exist? Because they are not permanent or, at least, durable enough to be considered a mappable

Re: [Tagging] Difference between graffiti and mural

2023-04-17 Thread Daniel Capilla
On 4/17/23 at 9:37, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: no, it is not the question, the requirement is: does it exist? That is a philosophical question: Does artwork exist? In the deep abysses of philosophy there is a door with that question engraved on it. I know because I have been there. My

Re: [Tagging] Difference between graffiti and mural

2023-04-17 Thread António Madeira
That's also important, of course, but not everything that exists is or should be mapped. Do you know why circus tents are not mapped, although they exist? Because they are not permanent or, at least, durable enough to be considered a mappable element. Existence is important, if (and this is

Re: [Tagging] Difference between graffiti and mural

2023-04-17 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 17 Apr 2023, at 01:08, António Madeira wrote: > > The question is: is it relevant? no, it is not the question, the requirement is: does it exist? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Difference between graffiti and mural

2023-04-17 Thread Daniel Capilla
Thank you! These points are valuable to me. They will be useful to discuss with the community and add to the page. I usually only map "notable" graffiti, more murals than graffiti in terms of OSM. In Wikimedia Commons you can see some examples of the graffiti/murals that I am mapping in