On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:47:21 +0200, Marc_marc wrote:
> Le 19.04.23 à 14:19, Matija Nalis a écrit :
>> I think that my point remains that:
>> - one method is clear and unambiguous ("fuel:lpg=no")
>> - one method is not clear / is ambiguous ("fuel=octane_98;diesel").
>>
>> So the first one should
Le 20.04.23 à 01:04, Graeme Fitzpatrick a écrit :
Is that actually on the sign?
yes it contains also symbols of bicycle hiking and inline_skates
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Presumably, sign contains symbols (hiker, bicycle and skate) and text.
Graeme Fitzpatrick :
> Is that actually on the sign?
>
> If not, it shouldn't be mapped.
>
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Is that actually on the sign?
If not, it shouldn't be mapped.
Thanks
Graeme
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 08:59, Marc_marc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a specialist appearance contributor adds in unicode characters
> to visually represent the type of travel present on a guildepost
>
> is this really a good
Hello,
a specialist appearance contributor adds in unicode characters
to visually represent the type of travel present on a guildepost
is this really a good idea ? [1]
if i want to find all the signs of line 3 inline_skates
not only do I need to test 9 keys + a few more on ways,
but I will
Le 19.04.23 à 14:19, Matija Nalis a écrit :
I think that my point remains that:
- one method is clear and unambiguous ("fuel:lpg=no")
- one method is not clear / is ambiguous ("fuel=octane_98;diesel").
So the first one should be preferred. Does that make sense?
- one is a nightmare for
Matija Nalis:
Hm, I do, but as it would be rather hard to prove (and such proof is not
paramount here), lets us just agree that it is how certain amount of
mappers use it (without trying to quantify it with subjective guesses).
I think it depend a lot from key to key.
I think that my point
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 09:23:42 +0200, Marc_marc wrote:
> Le 19.04.23 à 03:04, Matija Nalis a écrit :
>> following the automated edit code of conduct?
> following it mean to use the correct place for that : the talk ml :)
Oops, sorry, wrong OSM ML starting with "ta". :)
Now posted at correct place
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 13:17:41 +0200, Niels Elgaard Larsen
wrote:
> Matija Nalis:
>> e.g. if "fuel=octane_98;diesel" was tagged, it would be ambiguous - does
>> it mean that there there is no LPG, or that the mapper didn't care to survey
>> that separated area of fuel station where LPG is being
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 13:17:41 +0200, Niels Elgaard Larsen
wrote:
> Matija Nalis:
>> e.g. if "fuel=octane_98;diesel" was tagged, it would be ambiguous - does
>> it mean that there there is no LPG, or that the mapper didn't care to survey
>> that separated area of fuel station where LPG is being
Niels Elgaard Larsen :
> For example if you use the template for restaurants and fast_food (but not
> cafes for
> some reason) in JOSM, you get a combobox where you can select one or more
> values for
> "cuisine". I would not assume that if I select indian or sushi that it
> excludes asian.
>
Matija Nalis:
IMHO basically the main reason why multi-tag standard (e.g. fuel:octane_98=yes,
fuel:diesel=yes, fuel:lpg=no) was invented is precisely because in
multi-value system it would have been impossible to mark the difference
between "this fuel is not present" and "it is
Le 19.04.23 à 11:57, Philip Barnes a écrit :
if its octane 95 it will be E10
maybe
fuel:octane_95:E10 = yes
fuel:octane_99:E5 = yes
the ":" between octane and E gives the impression
that several combinations are possible.
If you say that this is not the case, then it seems more logical
to
On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 00:39 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
>
>
>
> Apr 19, 2023, 00:14 by mnalis-openstreetmapl...@voyager.hr:
> > On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:08:39 +0200, Marc_marc
> > wrote:
> > > Le 18.04.23 à 16:53, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :
> > > > Is tagging of
Le 19.04.23 à 03:04, Matija Nalis a écrit :
following the automated edit code of conduct?
following it mean to use the correct place for that : the talk ml :)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
15 matches
Mail list logo
