Hello,
Out of interesting talk on the community forum about hiking techniques
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/99869 the idea for a key to tag
certain challenges for pedestrians emerged and I split that to
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/106865 summarizing terms there.
Word was,
Following discussions in various places, I came to the conclusion that
the loungers I care about are not the loungers documented as such
under the amenity=lounger tag, but rather a kind of bench
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bench%3Dwave_lounger
Thank you all for participating. Now
I want this amenable to consumers. If I were to propose an attribute
to the other tag, I'd have to propose to deprecate the uses on areas
that allows for such atrocities as "amenity=lounger; surface=grass".
___
Tagging mailing list
Am So., 2. Juli 2023 um 10:10 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
>
> Why not subtag for https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dlounger ?
That other tag can be applied to areas in two different ways: either
representing a single item - or as a place, where
Please weigh in on this proposed new tag, here, in the community
forum, in the wiki talk page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Wave_lounger
Looking forward
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Am So., 18. Dez. 2022 um 21:32 Uhr schrieb Brian M. Sperlongano
:
>
> I recently came across an unexpected tagging combination and I would like to
> understand how folks in various places would interpret this:
>
> highway=
> foot=no
> sidewalk=separate
>
> In my software's logic, I've made the
There is still considerable heat in the voting. Ballot casting time
will be extended to give three weeks of voting.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway=scramble
Hungerburg
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Voting has started for Highway=Scramble.
The proposal underwent substantial changes during RfC. I am much
obliged to all those who did contribute sound advice and helped shape
the proposal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway=scramble
Hungerburg
Am Mo., 24. Okt. 2022 um 01:05 Uhr schrieb Illia Marchenko
:
>
> I suggest alternative solution: some machine readable spec, which defines
> mapping between stable identifier and tags. For example (XML):
>
>
>
[…]
In XML, ids must be unique. Did you mean "my personal notion of what
this
Am Mo., 10. Okt. 2022 um 19:42 Uhr schrieb Amanda McCann
:
>
> I'm a native English speaker, and I agree! I also wrote that part of the wiki
> (years ago). I think some non-native speakers treated `unisex=yes` as meaning
> “gender segregated but male & female are available”, i.e. read that
Hallo Georg,
I guess your demands are met by the proposal in current state. I'd
say, now only people that would oppose introduction of "highway=steps"
, because we can map hw=path+steps=yes can oppose "highway=scramble",
not the least, due to your nagging :) What do you think?
Convenience link
Nearly two weeks passed since the RfC started. Quite some changes have
happened. I’d like to invite a second reading, to help weed out
remaining problems.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway=scramble
Please comment in the medium of your choice.
Thank you in advance
Thank you Alan for the insightful comment. The scrambles I have in
mind require little to no generalization step. This is the concept
that I was missing to understand some previous comments.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Thank you Volker for linking cai_scale. During my research on the
subject, I learned, that the SAC itself is using its scales quite like
the CAI, as a means to note hikers about requirements of what in OSM
are called "routes", something, which starts at a POI and has a POI as
its goal, where the
Hello Georg, yes, Ueli Steck certainly is the wrong person, to grade
anything openstreetmap trails. I was a bit surprised, that
openstreetmap does not have a path up Eiger. If so, I'd propose
"highway=mountaineering" for it, just like the one up Mönch, which now
is T6 in fine-print, while
Am Fr., 16. Sept. 2022 um 00:24 Uhr schrieb Kevin Kenny
:
>
> yeah, looks like a YDS class 2, or `sac_scale=hiking`. Maybe
> `mountain_hiking` if that talus is unstable, because then you start to need
> some technique. I know some runners who would do that barefoot, but I think
> they're nuts.
Am Do., 15. Sept. 2022 um 00:30 Uhr schrieb martianfreeloader
:
>
> Imo, scramble would not only include via ferrata.
Unlike what I wrote yesterday, there is indeed some overlap of
scramble and via ferrata. There are via ferratas, that can be
hiked/scrambled without gear: Where the tourism office
Am Do., 15. Sept. 2022 um 00:09 Uhr schrieb Peter Elderson
:
>
> I like this proposed highway value. I would probably apply it to the actual
> scramble sections, though, not including path sections leading up to the
> scramble part. Renderers can then show the actual scramble sections.
Well,
Am Do., 15. Sept. 2022 um 21:15 Uhr schrieb Kevin Kenny
:
> I don't usually bother breaking up a way by scale if there are no
> intersections or PoI's along it. There may be flat spots in among the
> scrambles, and I generally don't bother trying to distinguish them.
In my opinion, this is
No idea, what should come first, and what should wait. Personally, I
do not see much overlap between a scramble and a via ferrata. A via
ferrata is a highway, where people follow a steel cable and enjoy some
easy climbing, all the while following a simple process, carabiner
click click, so they
It is proposed to create the tag highway=scramble as a base tag for hiking
paths, where use of hands is required, be that for keeping balance or be it
for pulling up.
Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/highway%3Dscramble
21 matches
Mail list logo
