[Tagging] Have our tagging voting rules changed recently?

Dear all, I'm the author of the proposal of natural=bare_soil. I didn't expect this modification to the voting process would have (correctly) raised this issue. As you can imagine and guessed, the motivation was to convey negative

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Ground: natural=bare_soil)

rer, already existing definition in literature, as suggested by others in the feature discussion. And also, it seems natural=bare_rock has been taken from there too. Thanks, I hope to receive some more guidance, -- Michael Montani GIS Consultant, Client Solutions Delivery Section Service for G

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Ground: natural=bare_soil)

close August 7th, given enough support. Thanks, -- Michael Montani GIS Consultant, Client Solutions Delivery Section Service for Geospatial Information and Telecommunications Technologies United Nations Global Service Centre United Nations Department of Operational Support Brindisi | Phone:

[Tagging] Farmlands subject to rotation of crops

there. Which would be the best way to tag such area? Thanks, -- Michael Montani GIS Consultant, Client Solutions Delivery Section Service for Geospatial Information and Telecommunications Technologies United Nations Global Service Centre United Nations Department of Operational Support Brindisi

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)

I think it is a good idea to consider a threshold of vegetation present on the ground in order not to confuse the proposed natural=bare_soil with other landcover tags as natural=scrub or natural=grassland. According to the CORINE landcover definitions we mentioned before, sparsely vegetated

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)

l targeting all the areas of unconsolidated ground material could be used whether or not a groundy area hasn't already a tag that suits better its representation (e.g. natural=wetland + intermittent=yes, landuse=quarry...). Thanks, -- Michael Montani GIS Consultant, Client Solutions Delivery Section Service f

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)

ttps://land.copernicus.eu/user-corner/technical-library/corine-land-cover-nomenclature-guidelines/docs/pdf/CLC2018_Nomenclature_illustrated_guide_20190510.pdf> It seems to me anyway those classes are looser than OSM's  Thanks, -- Michael Montani GIS Consultant, Client Solutions D

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)

os in Africa, but I think these areas are very common in places outside the European context. Feel free to add photos (if you have any) at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Ground#Examples Thanks, -- Michael Montani GIS Consultant, Client Solutions Delivery Section Service

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)

l free to leave a comment on any photo, e.g. whether or not you would it consider as soil. I would be also curious to know what tag would you use to map the ground of this kind of areas with the already existent tags. Thanks, -- Michael Montani GIS Consultant, Client Solutions Delivery Section S

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)

be considered as bare soil anyway? Thanks -- Michael Montani GIS Consultant, Client Solutions Delivery Section Service for Geospatial Information and Telecommunications Technologies United Nations Global Service Centre United Nations Department of Operational Support Brindisi | Phone: +39 0831

[Tagging] R: Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)

eral to me. If natural=bare_soil receives enough support we can change to that one. Also add your thoughts to the discussion page in the wiki in such a way to keep track of all the suggestions. Thanks, -- Michael Montani GIS Consultant, Client Solutions Delivery Section Service for

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)

options are open to discussion). Description: "An area covered by soil, without any vegetation" You can find the proposal wikipage here<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Ground>. I hope this proposal will receive as many contributions possible, thank you -- Michae

[Tagging] R: Are we mapping ground on OSM?

age dataset can definetely help to map landcover and many ones are out there. The discussion is not about seasonality of lakes but generally on ground. To me, a tag proposal natural=ground, ground:type=organic/mineral with the further possibility to specify soil type seems reasonable. Thanks, -- Mi

[Tagging] Are we mapping ground on OSM?

r thought about how to address this issue? Which tags would you use / propose (if needed) to map ground? Thanks, -- Michael Montani GIS Consultant, Client Solutions Delivery Section Service for Geospatial Information and Telecommunications Technologies United Nations Global Service Centre United Nations