This proposal is interesting. Giving a rapid look on the CORINE classes, it seems bare soil is included in all other classes but it hasn't a class per se.
* CORINE library<https://land.copernicus.eu/user-corner/technical-library/corine-land-cover-nomenclature-guidelines/html/index.html> * 333 Sparsely vegetated areas<https://land.copernicus.eu/user-corner/technical-library/corine-land-cover-nomenclature-guidelines/html/index-clc-333.html> * 332 Bare rock<https://land.copernicus.eu/user-corner/technical-library/corine-land-cover-nomenclature-guidelines/html/index-clc-332.html> * 331 Beaches, sand and dunes<https://land.copernicus.eu/user-corner/technical-library/corine-land-cover-nomenclature-guidelines/html/index-clc-331.html> the most near imo. * Many others, searching for "ground" and "soil" into the manual<https://land.copernicus.eu/user-corner/technical-library/corine-land-cover-nomenclature-guidelines/docs/pdf/CLC2018_Nomenclature_illustrated_guide_20190510.pdf> It seems to me anyway those classes are looser than OSM's 😄 Thanks, -- Michael Montani GIS Consultant, Client Solutions Delivery Section Service for Geospatial Information and Telecommunications Technologies United Nations Global Service Centre United Nations Department of Operational Support Brindisi | Phone: +39 0831 056985 | Mobile: +39 3297193455 | Intermission: 158 6985 E-mail: michael.mont...@un.org<mailto:m...@un.org> | www.ungsc.org<http://www.ungsc.org> ________________________________ Da: Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> Inviato: martedì 14 luglio 2020 15:29 A: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging@openstreetmap.org> Cc: Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com>; Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging@openstreetmap.org> Oggetto: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground) Maybe. I would be interested in specific proposals. 14 Jul 2020, 14:24 by vosc...@gmail.com: I am not a land cover expert, but have come across a great number of obviously wrong land cover tagging in OSM. Said this, why not try to use CORINE [1] definitions? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordination_of_Information_on_the_Environment On Tue, 14 Jul 2020, 11:52 Christoph Hormann, <o...@imagico.de<mailto:o...@imagico.de>> wrote: > Joseph Eisenberg > <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com<mailto:joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>> hat am 13. > Juli 2020 um 22:34 geschrieben: > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/chrishunkeler/32097822997 > I think this is a great example why more specific tags are advisable to use in OSM than a generic bare ground tag. What this picture shows is commonly known as desert pavement: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert_pavement Apart from varying in size distribution and density as well as material of the stones these form a fairly characteristic surface that can and should be mapped distinctly. As size of the larger stones strongly affects navigability, specifying that would be a valuable supplemental tag. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
