Re: [Tagging] Proposed definition for cycleways (was Re: bicycle=no)

2010-01-05 Thread Peter Childs
2010/1/5 Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de: Hi! Am 05.01.2010 11:45, schrieb Richard Mann: On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de mailto:ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:     Real cycleways with official signs are an obstacle to me that I need to     avoid. I know German cyclists are fast, but

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-newbies] Community Centres

2009-11-22 Thread Peter Childs
2009/11/22 Nick Austin nick.w.aus...@gmail.com: On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Karl k...@digitalattic.net wrote: Your description The first thing that came to my mind was what we call a community hall, a multi-purpose building that can be rented by various local community groups, or by

Re: [Tagging] How to tag un-named roundabout?

2009-11-21 Thread Peter Childs
2009/11/21 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com: Paul Johnson wrote: If it really doesn't have any name at all, then noname=yes is awesome because it solves the human problem, too. This discussion has been flogged to death on other forums, but obviously needs repeating. People are incorrectly

Re: [Tagging] Are tunnels only below ground? (Was

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Childs
2009/11/4 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@googlemail.com oh and I forgot to give a word of warning in the other direction. Some structures that you might think are bridges are actually tunnels because of the way they were constructed, but I'll leave that to another day ;-) Cheers

Re: [Tagging] Are tunnels only below ground? (Was

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Childs
2009/11/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com 2009/11/4 Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net We don't *have* to stick to dictionary definitions here when tagging, as long as the meaning is clear; exactly, this is not generally about dictionary definitions but about the meaning of

Re: [Tagging] Are tunnels only below ground? (Was

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Childs
2009/11/4 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org 2009/11/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com 2009/11/4 Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net We don't *have* to stick to dictionary definitions here when tagging, as long as the meaning is clear; exactly, this is not generally about dictionary

Re: [Tagging] Best practice regarding addr:housenumber and POIs

2009-10-15 Thread Peter Childs
2009/10/15 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com: Hi I'm wondering what is best practice regarding tagging addr:housenumber and POIs, e.g. amenity=restaurant. Let's assume that on Mainstreet 10 there's a restaurant named Thai Wok. Should there be one node or two? One single node with