I've drafted a proposal for platform barriers here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/platform_barrier
jc86035
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I think just using platform door tags instead of platform gate tags
should be enough, since there isn't a way to say something is
ceiling-height yet (this matches the aforementioned door=* proposal,
where doors are supposed to control ventilation etc.).
jc86035
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017, at 9:12
sage-ID: <7e170a8b-9d85-4c54-9844-6516eb269...@mac.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>
> Javbw
>
>> On Apr 16, 2017, at 12:49 AM, jc86035 <jc86...@openmailbox.org> wrote:
>>
>> It'd be easier for mappers to just add a
. It'd be easier for mappers to just add a tag to the platform
or the side of the platform area.
jc86035
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 at 15:07 +, Marc Gemis
wrote:
> there is this proposal for all kinds of doors:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Andreas.balzer/door-proposal-ve
ong:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HK_%E8%8D%83%E7%81%A3%E7%AB%99_Tsuen_Wan_MTR_Station_platform_screen_doors_Jan_2017_Lnv2_(2).jpg
Saint-Lazare Paris Metro station platform gates:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ligne-13-Saint-Lazare-1.jpg
jc86035
> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:21:03
There doesn't seem to be a way to tag platform screen doors and
automatic platform gates right now. If they should be in OSM, should
they be tagged as (e.g.) barrier=psd / barrier=apg, and should we have
another tag for specifying the number of doors/gates?
jc86035
Should a separate bug be filed to fix iD before your fix to use CLDR is
implemented, and would it be a good idea to go through all of the
objects using name:zh-yue=* (via overpass turbo) and replace the tag
with name:yue=*?
jc86035
Bryan Housel:
> Worth mentioning here that iD might be do
?)
jc86035
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
of the
two systems.
jc86035
Michael Reichert:
> Hi,
>
> railway=* should depend on the infrastructure only. The services which
> use the track, don't matter.
>
> Am 22.11.2016 um 15:41 schrieb Michael Tsang:
>> On Tuesday 22 November 2016 11:28:00 jc86035 wrote:
>>&
n stations) with railway=subway, as well as the sections of the
East Rail Line without intercity train service (without asking anyone).
Should the lines be retagged as railway=rail, since they're not really
subway/metro lines?
jc86035
___
Tagging mailing li
10 matches
Mail list logo