> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 09:04:57 +0900 > From: John Willis <jo...@mac.com> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Platform screen doors and automatic platform > gates > Message-ID: <7e170a8b-9d85-4c54-9844-6516eb269...@mac.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > Javbw > >> On Apr 16, 2017, at 12:49 AM, jc86035 <jc86...@openmailbox.org> wrote: >> >> It'd be easier for mappers to just add a tag to the platform >> or the side of the platform area. > It might just be a tagged value of the transportation platform (like > covered=yes), but unmapped. > > Or perhaps, since the barrier is quite long is places (100m in Tokyo) and > 2/3rds of it is a unmoving wall, perhaps putting it in barrier=* is a good > idea, like barrier=platform_protection or similar. Some of the barriers are > whole walls with doors in the walls (Korea), or a low wall/fence you can put > your elbows on top of, with sliding gates that are also about 1m tall. > > Map it as a way along the edge of the platform polygon, and you could use > nodes for the doors and add ref=* as necessary for the door positions (they > are all labeled in Tokyo) platform_protection=gate or similar to keep it out > of the normal barrier=gate. > > Javbw.
I think it might help to have barrier=platform_gates and barrier=platform_doors to avoid requiring another tag for which type it is (default material=glass?). Having the nodes as platform_protection=* (maybe platform_separation=*?) instead of barrier=* seems like a good idea, since otherwise gates would all be rendered as regular gates. jc86035 _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
