Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carport

[2017-02-04 18:56] Joachim > > A carport is distinctive enough from building=garage and building=roof > so that an own tag should be used. [...] > The key building=* is used since a carport is a type > of building=roof. Funny how you first try to set the carport apart from

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Key:oven - Approved

Hoi, I like to inform you that the oven proposal was approved with 16 votes (0 opposes, 0 abstains). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:oven Many thanks to everyone who voted! meillo (on behalf of Giardia) ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Nesting Site - Approved :-)

Hoi, the voting for the Nesting Site proposal has now been closed. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Nesting_Site It was approved with 26 votes for, 1 vote against and 0 abstentions. I want to thank anyone who voted or contributed in other ways. It was great to see this

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - "Key:oven"

Hoi, closely related to the bakehouse/baking_oven proposal, Yvan just moved to the voting phase, is the proposal for Key:oven, which I have to honor to open for voting on behalf of Giardia. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:oven Yvan already wrote that we worked well

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Nesting Site) ... was Bird Tower

Hoi, we now have reworked our Bird Tower proposal, trying to incorporate all comments we have received. The result is located there: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Nesting_Site (The old URL redirects.) The old voting state (until the vote was aborted) was moved

[Tagging] How to change currently voted on proposal (Bird Tower)?

Hoi community, we are currently in voting phase for our Bird Tower proposal. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bird_Tower It happens that we are currently receiving comments, which we would have liked to receive during RFC phase. Well, we don't mind because these comments

Re: [Tagging] Key:visibility

[2016-11-29 11:10] Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > 2016-11-29 7:02 GMT+01:00 markus schnalke <mei...@marmaro.de>: > > This is just like the smoothness=* case. Instead of having values > like ``excellent'', ``bad'' or ``horrible'', we now learned

Re: [Tagging] Key:visibility

[2016-11-28 20:50] Paul Desgranges > > Visibility and readability are not the same, [...] They also suggest different meanings, at least to me. When I first read you message about visibility of public clocks, I thought it would indicate from which directions or places

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Bird Tower

Hoi, after some last improvements during the RFC phase, we feel that our Bird Tower proposal now is ready to be voted on. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bird_Tower Please participate in the voting to achieve a high turnout. For the OSM group UlmerAlb, meillo

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Bird Tower

Hoi, in the name of the mapping group UlmerAlb, I welcome you to discuss our proposal for tower:type=nesting_site to tag a man made bird nesting aid mounted on a mast or tower. In short: A bird tower is a man made mast or tower equipped with one or multiple birds nests, serving as an

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tag:building=bakehouse

[2016-10-17 13:14] Yvan Masson > > After 4 days as a draft, I switched the "Tag:building=bakehouse" > proposal to "proposed" status. Great to see the advancing of the proposal! :-) > Definition: "Building made especially as a baking oven, usually public" > URL: >

Re: [Tagging] Proposal : amenity=baking_oven

[2016-10-13 13:57] Tom Pfeifer <t.pfei...@computer.org> > On 13.10.2016 13:18, markus schnalke wrote: > > [2016-10-13 13:05] Yvan Masson <yvan.mas...@openmailbox.org> > >> > >> I just proposed the introduction of the "baking_oven" tag on > >

Re: [Tagging] Proposal : amenity=baking_oven

[2016-10-13 13:05] Yvan Masson > > Hi list, > > I just proposed the introduction of the "baking_oven" tag on > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/amenity%3Dbaking_oven > > I would be pleased if you could have a look on this draft and give your >

Re: [Tagging] Casing in values

[2016-08-25 10:51] "Jerry Clough (SK53)" <sk53_...@yahoo.co.uk> > On 25/08/2016 08:47, markus schnalke wrote: > > snip > > Is it the same for genus=Tilia, i.e. should it be genus=tilia? > > > > (Recently iD started to tab-complete it in lowercase, ev

Re: [Tagging] Casing in values (was: Multiple values for one key - the cuisine problem.)

[2016-08-25 09:15] Martin Koppenhoefer > > Il giorno 25 ago 2016, alle ore 06:18, André Pirard > > ha scritto: > > > > I saw that the OSM people are very picky about correct spelling. > > formal values are without capitalization in osm Is it

Re: [Tagging] How to tag high water marks (flood marks)?

[2016-07-20 10:45] Martin Koppenhoefer > > it appears there is already this tag in use, which might cover part of what > you > are after: > monitoring:water_level I disagree. As I understood it, monitoring:water_level is for regularily *monitoring* of the level, whereas

[Tagging] Structured approach to the multi-value discussion

Hoi, I like to suggest the following structured approach to tackle the multi-value (MV) topic: Phase 1: Are MV necessary? First, collect examples of seemingly necessary MVs in a wiki page. Classify them as ordered and unordered MVs. Discuss alternative tagging possibilities, which don't need

Re: [Tagging] Proposal about suffixed tags has been approved

[2016-02-25 01:37] moltonel 3x Combo > > That is part of the problem with the proposal, and its votes. It > touched lots of topics, and some people probably got confused about > the rather focused intent (I certainly did). For example there was > strong consensus on the list

Re: [Tagging] Voting rules

[2016-02-23 11:54] Andy Townsend > > > > It was provisionally rejected with 40 votes for, 18 votes against and > > 4 abstentions. > > Approval rate: 68.97%. Less than required 74% so provisional > > rejection; proposer to make final call. > > The tricky bit of course is that

Re: [Tagging] Discussion about Multivalued Keys

Hoi, I'd like to share some thoughts about the ``How to implement MV in OSM'' question, as opened in: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Multivalued_Keys I'd prefer to first have explicit agreement that we actually need MV ... but as the implementation discussion is already

Re: [Tagging] Discussion about Multivalued Keys

[2016-01-27 09:40] Tod Fitch > > Or, following the example of turn lanes, use semicolon for unordered > and vertical bar for ordered. It seems to me that a comma might be too > common a character in real world values to have a special use. While > an escape mechanism needs