On 18/08/2010 01:17, John Smith wrote:
On 18 August 2010 08:25, Andreas Labresl...@lab.at wrote:
I can't follow your argument here. A dancing school (or is ist called dance
school? in which part of the English world?) is an amenity, is it not?
The term amenity, if used in the
2010/8/18 Vincent Pottier vpott...@gmail.com:
On 18/08/2010 01:17, John Smith wrote:
On 18 August 2010 08:25, Andreas Labresl...@lab.at wrote:
I can't follow your argument here. A dancing school (or is ist called
dance
school? in which part of the English world?) is an amenity, is it not?
On 18 August 2010 01:06, Surly_ru p...@isnet.ru wrote:
I agree!! The term training here is much more suitable than school.
My recommendation is amenity=training + training=dance.
-1
The whole point of all the was to avoid adding any more amenity=* tags
unnecessarily, it's already an overly
My recommendation is amenity=training + training=dance.
-1
The whole point of all the was to avoid adding any more amenity=* tags
unnecessarily
OK! Let's discard amenity. Only training=dance is good too.
My suggestion is not about amenity. It is about changing school to
training.
On 17.08.10 17:11, John Smith wrote:
The whole point of all the was to avoid adding any more amenity=* tags
unnecessarily, it's already an overly abused dumping ground and makes
it difficult for doing generic icons for POIs...
I can't follow your argument here. A dancing school (or is ist
On 18 August 2010 01:28, Surly_ru p...@isnet.ru wrote:
Wouldn't that be a little counter initiative since they are called
dance schools, driving school, etc ?
These short-term training courses for adults are very different from
educational schools for children, despite of their name. So let's
Proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dancing_school
/al
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 17 August 2010 05:15, Andreas Labres l...@lab.at wrote:
Proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dancing_school
I'm wondering if a sub-tag would be more useful, eg
amenity=school
school=dance
That way you could group other similar schools, like martial arts,
using
On 17 August 2010 07:41, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
amenity=school
school=middle
I know I brought up middle schools, but are they deemed a type of
secondary school?
The reason I ask, it might be more useful to tag which grades, for
example in Australia there are central
2010/8/16 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
school=truck_driving
school=driving
driving:type=[car|truck|bike]
what about school=dolphins for a school of dolphins? Or hospital=tree
nursery? IMHO we shouldn't create our categories/keys only based on
language which might sometimes be
On 17 August 2010 07:57, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
-1, IMHO no. A dancing school, boxing school, ski school, etc. are
IMHO not in the same category than general-education schools. They
might be classified in one category, but that is IMHO not school.
That's what the sub
On 17 August 2010 08:03, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
what about school=dolphins for a school of dolphins? Or hospital=tree
nursery? IMHO we shouldn't create our categories/keys only based on
language which might sometimes be ambiguous or misleading.
So far you seem to be
On 8/16/10 6:06 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 17 August 2010 08:03, M∡rtin Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
what about school=dolphins for a school of dolphins? Or hospital=tree
nursery? IMHO we shouldn't create our categories/keys only based on
language which might sometimes be ambiguous
Am 17.08.2010 00:31, schrieb John Smith:
On 17 August 2010 08:24, Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
What is the benefit to put this all under amenity=school - and then have a
tag no renderer actually can use, because it is far too generic?
The benefit is an existing tag that isn't
2010/8/17 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 17 August 2010 08:24, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
What is the benefit to put this all under amenity=school - and then have a
tag no renderer actually can use, because it is far too generic?
The benefit is an existing tag
On 17 August 2010 08:53, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
it doesn't change the good point Ulf made: a potential data consumer
would have to know all school types for a pleasant results. Currently
That's actually a reason to sub-tag, so they can show a generic icon
instead of
2010/8/17 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 17 August 2010 08:53, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
it doesn't change the good point Ulf made: a potential data consumer
would have to know all school types for a pleasant results. Currently
That's actually a reason to
On 8/16/10 7:23 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 17 August 2010 09:20, M∡rtin Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
The point was (maybe my message was too long to get this clear) that
the same generic icon for schools which do general education in the
morning and maybe afternoon to kids AND the
On 17 August 2010 09:29, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
amenity=special_school
or something on that order, and then subtag with school=
i don't object to splitting that way, but there's no good reason
to further pollute amenity when we can subtag with school=
Do we even need an
On 17.08.10 01:29, Richard Welty wrote:
amenity=special_school
or something on that order, and then subtag with school=
I can't see any benefit subsuming those ...schools that are no schools under
one tag. They all need special icons, there is no generic icon for these.
One more thing, a
On 8/16/10 8:39 PM, Andreas Labres wrote:
On 17.08.10 01:29, Richard Welty wrote:
amenity=special_school
or something on that order, and then subtag with school=
I can't see any benefit subsuming those ...schools that are no schools under
one tag. They all need special icons, there is no
On 17.08.10 02:46, Richard Welty wrote:
there are dancing schools and there are dancing schools
Well, maybe we need a subtag... ;)
/al
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
22 matches
Mail list logo
