On 03.12.2022 11:49, Alex wrote:
_Mainly_, I have concerns about the concept of a cycle path or foot
path being attendant to or a sidepath of another road.
In Norway, we no longer have cycle paths and foot paths. We have
cycleways, footways and carriageways. It may seem like a small
_Mainly_, I have concerns about the concept of a cycle path or foot
path being attendant to or a sidepath of another road.
In Norway, we no longer have cycle paths and foot paths. We have
cycleways, footways and carriageways. It may seem like a small
difference in terminology, but it makes
The whole proposal is a pragmatic compromise to the fact that we do not
have an usable solution for "grouping" paths within a road corridor. As
we know, relations cannot be used effectively for this at present (if we
are already talking about the "effort" to tag a sidepath with a single
On 02.12.2022 13:31, Alex wrote:
Paths and ways along a road can be mapped separately in OSM, but those
separate geometries cannot be identified as part of the road, or only
with the significant effort of using geometric processing (which most
applications can't perform).
I strongly agree
2 gru 2022, 20:50 od m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us:
> Vào lúc 08:44 2022-12-02, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging đã viết:
>
>> I have good news! There is preprocessing solution for large (nearly all?)
>> simple cases,
>> written in Kotlin and is a part of StreetComplete.
>>
>> StreetComplete
Vào lúc 07:54 2022-12-02, Tobias Knerr đã viết:
On 02.12.22 15:02 Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
If it is second case of preprocessing being impossible -
why do massive duplication and ask to duplicate ref value
AND name value AND highway value?
The duplication-free solution of referencing the
Vào lúc 08:44 2022-12-02, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging đã viết:
I have good news! There is preprocessing solution for large (nearly
all?) simple cases,
written in Kotlin and is a part of StreetComplete.
StreetComplete would be able to handle cases listed in its sidewalk
detection
(used to
2 gru 2022, 16:54 od o...@tobias-knerr.de:
> On 02.12.22 15:02 Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
>> Or is it justifiable because it is outright impossible to do reliably
>> with automatic preprocessing?
>>
>
> I would say that's the reason. Of course, it's hard to prove that something
> is
On 02.12.22 15:02 Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Or is it justifiable because it is outright impossible to do reliably
with automatic preprocessing?
I would say that's the reason. Of course, it's hard to prove that
something is impossible. But so far no one has built a working solution
for
"or only with the significant effort of using geometric processing
(which most applications can't perform)"
why doing it manually would be preferable?
Is it repeating mistake of adding pointless work for mappers
because it "causes extra preprocessing for routing software."?
And valuing time
Paths and ways along a road can be mapped separately in OSM, but those
separate geometries cannot be identified as part of the road, or only
with the significant effort of using geometric processing (which most
applications can't perform). However, the information whether a path is
attendant
11 matches
Mail list logo
