Le 10.10.22 à 14:07, Matija Nalis a écrit :
(i.e. are we talking about how many thinly 3 years olds_or_ have super-obese
adults can fit there?)
As with all slightly subjective values, at best an average use is given.
example: a path (too narrow for for a car of average width) is
sometimes
Hi Mitja,
I've drafted two opposing proposals on whether capacity/seats should be
tagged on benches without a functional separation into seats or not.
The purpose is to find out if there is a community consensus on this
question.
"Sure, it's fine to tag capacity, even if there is now
On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 14:20:09 +0200 (CEST), Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
wrote:
> This revert makes sense to me.
>
> BTW, one may count both seats and capacity on benches, why not
One might even decide to tag
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:length
instead (or in addition) to `seats`,
This revert makes sense to me.
BTW, one may count both seats and capacity on benches, why not
Oct 2, 2022, 22:15 by dafadl...@gmail.com:
> Until very recently, the wiki said that seats=* means seats, not capacity:
>
>
I agree that the old text for seats=* is much better. I would add capacity=*
with the new text: Number of people who can comfortably sit on the bench at one
time.
I think it's not a problem that mappers may estimate differently, most will
agree most of the time, and if the previous mapper e.g.
Until very recently, the wiki said that seats=* means seats, not capacity:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%3Dbench=2357111=2347958
In my opinion, this should be reverted.
Besides, i'm not very enthusiastic about using capacity=* because this
is quite subjective -
--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:58:35 +0000
> From: martianfreeloader
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Bench: replace seats
> by capaci
Hello,
Le 29.09.22 à 18:26, martianfreeloader a écrit :
I am considering two groups of mutually exclusive
proposals to settle this issue
propose, withdraw, re-propose in 24 hours, that's a bit fast.
give time for ideas to mature.
I've done some research on how the tag is used, (I'm leaving
Hello,
Le 29.09.22 à 19:11, Anne-Karoline Distel a écrit :
I don't have a number of 3-4 friends with me when I'm mapping to test the bench
really ?
sitting in the middle of the bench, I have an idea if the bench
is 2-3-4 seats, in the same way that a friend of yours could see
for himself if
This person's opinion: I very much like capacity with amenity=bench,
especially when it is "significantly greater than two or three," though I also
see great merit in saying capacity=1 to emphasize "single-seat only" in some
cases where that might be or is unusual, or even usual!
Y'know, this
I have stopped tagging seats, because most benches do not have seats.
Capacity is ok with me, I will start using that, but still I don't think I
will tag that very often, unless it's a huge bench for 20 (I have seen
one!) or a very small one for 1 person. I don't mind if others tag seats or
Most times, I don't map the number of seats, because I don't have a
number of 3-4 friends with me when I'm mapping to test the bench, so I
can't tell how many people can sit on it. They installed a few 1-seater
"benches" in my locality during lockdown, I added it then. But I agree
that it might
I personally find it more consistent to reduce the number of synonymous
keys across all objects.
But yes, I am considering two groups of mutually exclusive proposals to
settle this issue. Something along these lines:
-
ISSUE 1
Should the capacity of a bench be tagged on all benches or
sent from a phone
> On 29 Sep 2022, at 14:10, martianfreeloader
> wrote:
>
> Facing heavy objections and no support, I have come to the conclusion that my
> proposal is not considered useful by the community.
>
> I thus decided to retract it.
as you are interested in consistency, have
Facing heavy objections and no support, I have come to the conclusion
that my proposal is not considered useful by the community.
I thus decided to retract it.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
I propose to stop using seats=* on benches. Instead, capacity=* should
be used.
For details, see the proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bench:_replace_seats_by_capacity
Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page.
Sorry for double-posting.
It has been brought to my attention that I had accidentally written my
original mail within an existing thread.
I hope, this one fixes it.
Original mail:
For consistency's sake, I propose to stop using seats=* on benches.
Instead, capacity=*
For consistency's sake, I propose to stop using seats=* on benches.
Instead, capacity=* should be used.
For details, see the proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bench:_replace_seats_by_capacity
Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page.
18 matches
Mail list logo
