Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - CoreIndoor

Currently nothing breaks when SIT is used and additional ways are added as a stop gap measure to enable "current" routing engines to work a bit in such areas (just as it is common to do with pedestrian areas and so on), and nobody has suggested that such mapping be outlawed (if that was at all

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - CoreIndoor

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:42:13PM +0100, Tobias Knerr wrote: > (2.) Corridors/stairs can use ways > > This is probably where opinions will vary the most. The decision in favour > of area tagging was one of the most fundamental that we made when drafting > SIT. Because of this, using highway

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - CoreIndoor

Hello Pavel, On 08.02.2017 09:09, Pavel Zbytovský wrote: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/CoreIndoor as one of the authors of Simple Indoor Tagging (SIT), I'd like to comment on each of your proposed changes. So please excuse the wall of text below. :) First, thank

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - CoreIndoor

Hello, Thanks for this work and this proposal. As an indoor mapper, I find these edits to the Simple Indoor Tagging full of sense. They document some local practices (level:ref is already used in France for complex buildings) and also makes clearer how to consume data (repeat_on + decimal

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - CoreIndoor

Hi Lorenzo, that is exactly right. See Simple Indoor tagging - chapter Multi-level : btw, the thesis was very positively accepted in my university :-) *For all, please: * --> I think its

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - CoreIndoor

2017-02-08 10:16 GMT+01:00 Pavel Zbytovský : > Its not about new tags, just through explanation of cases for level=* > ad level=-1-8) It means -1 to 8. This is already well established and not > matter for discussion. > Hi Pavel, so if we have an elevator for the underground

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - CoreIndoor

Hi Warin, Thanks for feedback, still I dont get the meaing of your first sentence, sorry. ad way too big) could you suggest proper partitioning? Its not about new tags, just through explanation of cases for level=* ad level=-1-8) It means -1 to 8. This is already well established and not matter

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - CoreIndoor

Err 60 seconds and .. Way too big ... as in too many things in the one proposal. I would break it up into the individual keys. The layer=-1-8 .. confusing .. is that -1 to -8 or -1 to 8 ? On 08-Feb-17 07:09 PM, Pavel Zbytovský wrote: Hello, I have some points about indoor mapping. There is

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - CoreIndoor

Hello, I have some points about indoor mapping. There is already an established tagging scheme - the Simple Indoor Tagging - but I think it could be refined a little. Especially it doesn't allow for easy corridors placement, and also some definitions could be more rigorous. Last year I finished