Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Leisure=Skatepark

2019-12-10 Thread Paul Allen
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 01:03, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > On 09.12.2019 19:09, Paul Allen wrote: > > Where it does cause problems is for people using the query tool (or > > equivalent in things like maps.me ) being confused by > tennis pitches, shooting > > pitches, andthe like. > >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Leisure=Skatepark

2019-12-10 Thread Tom Pfeifer
On 09.12.2019 19:09, Paul Allen wrote: On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 17:31, Tom Pfeifer mailto:t.pfei...@computer.org>> wrote: I'd prefer to keep it leisure=pitch, avoiding top-level tag fragmentation. Refinements about the sport definition can appear in the sport=* subtagging. I can

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Leisure=Skatepark

2019-12-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Mo., 9. Dez. 2019 um 18:31 Uhr schrieb Tom Pfeifer < t.pfei...@computer.org>: > On 09.12.2019 03:13, Scott via Tagging wrote: > > Description: An area designated and equipped for skateboarding, in-line > skating, BMX'ing, or scootering. > > > > Proposal for fixing improper definition of

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Leisure=Skatepark

2019-12-09 Thread Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi
To me a skatepark is a well defined thing, different and with no major problems of conflict with other places for sport. I don't see particular problems in using an appropriate tag that better characterizes what it is instead of relying a rather vague recipe of tags. I suggest to check the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Leisure=Skatepark

2019-12-09 Thread Paul Allen
On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 22:34, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: leisure=pitch has never sat well with many sports; > table tennis .. a pitch? > chess .. a pitch? > cricket.. the pitch is the bit in the middle .. not the playing area which > is a 'field'... > > leisure=sports_field might be

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Leisure=Skatepark

2019-12-09 Thread Warin
On 10/12/19 05:09, Paul Allen wrote: On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 17:31, Tom Pfeifer > wrote: I'd prefer to keep it leisure=pitch, avoiding top-level tag fragmentation. Refinements about the sport definition can appear in the sport=* subtagging. I can

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Leisure=Skatepark

2019-12-09 Thread Paul Allen
On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 17:31, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > I'd prefer to keep it leisure=pitch, avoiding top-level tag fragmentation. > Refinements about the > sport definition can appear in the sport=* subtagging. > I can understand that viewpoint. I'm not sure that there is any technical merit, in

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Leisure=Skatepark

2019-12-09 Thread Tom Pfeifer
On 09.12.2019 03:13, Scott via Tagging wrote: Description: An area designated and equipped for skateboarding, in-line skating, BMX'ing, or scootering. Proposal for fixing improper definition of sport=skateboarding, creating skatepark as a result, and other relevant access and equipment tags.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Leisure=Skatepark

2019-12-08 Thread Scott via Tagging
Great question. I'm not a BMXer, just an aggressive inline skater so I am not a definitive authority on BMX culture by any stretch. I thought they were still called skate parks given I've seen organizations like Red Bull have referred to them as such

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Leisure=Skatepark

2019-12-08 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
One question (from a *very* non-skateboarder!) ... You've made reference to a "BMX only skatepark". If it's BMX only, would it still be called a skatepark? Thanks Graeme On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 12:14, Scott via Tagging wrote: > Description: An area designated and equipped for skateboarding,

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Leisure=Skatepark

2019-12-08 Thread Scott via Tagging
Description: An area designated and equipped for skateboarding, in-line skating, BMX'ing, or scootering. Proposal for fixing improper definition of sport=skateboarding, creating skatepark as a result, and other relevant access and equipment tags.