Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=trailhead

2023-02-24 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Feb 24, 2023, 09:25 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > > > > On 23/2/23 21:18, Peter Elderson wrote: > >> I would like to change the status of thisestablished tag to >> approved. I have altered the previous >> proposal >> >>

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=trailhead

2023-02-24 Thread Peter Elderson
Martin Koppenhoefer : > I believe setting up voting to approve a tag with "de-facto"-status is a > waste of time, particularly if you do not intend to refine the definition, > and an approval will only "downgrade" the tag from "de-facto" to > "approved". People have already voted on the tag by

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=trailhead

2023-02-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
I believe setting up voting to approve a tag with "de-facto"-status is a waste of time, particularly if you do not intend to refine the definition, and an approval will only "downgrade" the tag from "de-facto" to "approved". People have already voted on the tag by using it thousands of times.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=trailhead

2023-02-24 Thread Marc_marc
Le 24.02.23 à 11:47, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : If it fails, will it change the tag status from "de-facto" to what? it'll not change the status of the tag :) voting is about a proposal, not about "tags" the proposals endorse tags, this is playing with words. It has the merit of saying

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=trailhead

2023-02-24 Thread Peter Elderson
Voting is about formal acceptance of the de facto usage. I do not expect any no's, but maybe someone was against the tag al these years and now finally gets the chance to say no. A fail will not change anything to the de facto usage. If a bunch of no votes appear, I will simply cancel my

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=trailhead

2023-02-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Fr., 24. Feb. 2023 um 10:49 Uhr schrieb Peter Elderson < pelder...@gmail.com>: > Sorry, I wasn't clear. The current status of the tag is de facto (was: in > use, but someone, not me, amended that). The proposal intends to alter > that from de facto to approved, by voting. > > Fr gr Peter

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=trailhead

2023-02-24 Thread Peter Elderson
Sorry, I wasn't clear. The current status of the tag is de facto (was: in use, but someone, not me, amended that). The proposal intends to alter that from de facto to approved, by voting. Fr gr Peter Elderson Op vr 24 feb. 2023 om 09:24 schreef Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > On 23/2/23

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=trailhead

2023-02-24 Thread Warin
On 23/2/23 21:18, Peter Elderson wrote: I would like to change the status of this established tag to approved. I have altered the previous proposal to match the established practice. No, it has not been 'approved' so it

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=trailhead

2023-02-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Do., 23. Feb. 2023 um 11:24 Uhr schrieb Peter Elderson < pelder...@gmail.com>: > I would like to change the status of this established tag to approved. I > have altered the previous proposal > to > match the established

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=trailhead

2023-02-23 Thread Peter Elderson
I would like to change the status of this established tag to approved. I have altered the previous proposal to match the established practice. Any comments are welcome, but please note that I am not proposing changes in mapping. I