Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-08 Thread André Riedel
2010/9/6 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net: If you can do so without requiring that mappers happy with generator:method=gasification be forced to instead enter a more complicated mixture of tags to describe those precise processes, then I wouldn't argue against your proposal. It wouldn't interest

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-08 Thread Tom Chance
On 8 September 2010 09:34, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/9/6 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net: If you can do so without requiring that mappers happy with generator:method=gasification be forced to instead enter a more complicated mixture of tags to describe those precise

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-08 Thread Tom Chance
On 8 September 2010 11:33, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote: But your proposal is not a small change of the whole power=generator system. A change of tagging for example a tidal power plant shoud not be done every month. So it would be great if you can stop your fighting to push the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-06 Thread Tom Chance
Andre, On 4 September 2010 15:11, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote: There are still some mismatches between source and method. e.g. generator:source=nuclear, generator:methode=fission A nuclear fission do not creates electricity it only creates a steam to power a turbine. This is

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-06 Thread John Smith
On 6 September 2010 18:40, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote: Feel free to propose another tag! generator:method=fission fission=* ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-06 Thread André Riedel
2010/9/6 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net: On 4 September 2010 15:11, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote: There are still some mismatches between source and method. e.g. generator:source=nuclear, generator:methode=fission A nuclear fission do not creates electricity it only creates a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-06 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/6 André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com: Fission power plants could use 'clean' uranium 238 or (with a special license) a plutonium uranium mixture (MOX) or Thorium MOX. does this on the other hand suggest I don't need a special license to run my fission reactor in the attic with ordinary

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-06 Thread John Smith
On 6 September 2010 23:22, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: does this on the other hand suggest I don't need a special license to run my fission reactor in the attic with ordinary Uranium 238? :D A 17 year old has already attempted to do something like this in their mother's

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-06 Thread André Riedel
2010/9/6 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: 2010/9/6 André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com: Fission power plants could use 'clean' uranium 238 or (with a special license) a plutonium uranium mixture (MOX) or Thorium MOX. does this on the other hand suggest I don't need a special

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-06 Thread Tom Chance
On 6 September 2010 13:46, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/9/6 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net: Nobody needs the tag to be generator:method=fission-creating-steam-to-power-a-turbine-that-induces-an-electric-current, or

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-04 Thread Tom Chance
On 3 September 2010 23:16, Pierre-Alain Dorange pdora...@mac.com wrote: Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote: If voted through, I will look at updating existing data in OpenStreetMap. I do not follow this discussion, but automatic data update is generally not welcome on OSM. It can/would

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-04 Thread André Riedel
2010/9/3 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net: Please vote on my proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/generator_rationalisation It has gone through several weeks of discussion on this list and on the wiki. I have made significant changes to the proposal to make it as

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-03 Thread Tom Chance
Please vote on my proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/generator_rationalisation It has gone through several weeks of discussion on this list and on the wiki. I have made significant changes to the proposal to make it as flexible as seems sensible. If voted through, I

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010-09-03 Thread Peter Wendorff
On 04.09.2010 00:16, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote: Tom Chancet...@acrewoods.net wrote: Please vote on my proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/generator_rationalisation It has gone through several weeks of discussion on this list and on the wiki. I have made