Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Pumping proposal

2020-12-16 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Brian Le mar. 15 déc. 2020 à 00:57, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit : > The wiki[1] says: "OpenStreetMap does not have 'banned features', as > anybody is allowed and encouraged to use any tag they think is useful." > Therefore, deprecating a feature does not "enforce or forbid" the use of a >

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Pumping proposal

2020-12-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 14. Dec 2020, at 23:11, François Lacombe wrote: > Furthermore, :type suffixes make things complex and don't bring any > additional information as anything is a type or category of something yes, the keys should rather say which kind of type they are referring to. For

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Pumping proposal

2020-12-14 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:11 PM François Lacombe wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thank you for your comments > > Le lun. 14 déc. 2020 à 00:40, Brian M. Sperlongano > a écrit : > >> 1. The proposal states "It is proposed to discourage the use of >> undocumented pump:type=* to state pump mechanisms in

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Pumping proposal

2020-12-14 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Volker Le lun. 14 déc. 2020 à 06:58, Volker Schmidt a écrit : > My main point got lost: the proposal should explain how the mapping of > pumps in pumping stations should be handled, short of using indoor mapping, > especially as your cover photo shows an indoors pump in an industrial >

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Pumping proposal

2020-12-14 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Brian, Thank you for your comments Le lun. 14 déc. 2020 à 00:40, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit : > 1. The proposal states "It is proposed to discourage the use of > undocumented pump:type=* to state pump mechanisms in favour of new > pump_mechanism=*." It is not clear what is meant by

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Pumping proposal

2020-12-13 Thread Volker Schmidt
My main point got lost: the proposal should explain how the mapping of pumps in pumping stations should be handled, short of using indoor mapping, especially as your cover photo shows an indoors pump in an industrial building. On Mon, 14 Dec 2020, 00:40 Brian M. Sperlongano, wrote: > François,

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Pumping proposal

2020-12-13 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
François, thank you for your hard work on this proposal! I will most likely support this version. I have a few questions: 1. The proposal states "It is proposed to discourage the use of undocumented pump:type=* to state pump mechanisms in favour of new pump_mechanism=*." It is not clear what

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Pumping proposal

2020-12-13 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Mateusz, Joseph, You were right, it was mistakes and it's now fixed. Thank you for you vigilance. Le dim. 13 déc. 2020 à 23:17, Volker Schmidt a écrit : > Missing at first glance: what is the mapper expected to do with pumping > stations. > Hi Volker Anyone could map

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Pumping proposal

2020-12-13 Thread Volker Schmidt
Missing at first glance: what is the mapper expected to do with pumping stations. We have around here in the Po valley, thousands of them for draining purposes., and I presume that places like the Netherland have considerably more of them. Many are housed in dedicated and locked buildings and they

Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Pumping proposal

2020-12-13 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pumping_proposal#Examples Looking at the first example - I see nothing clearly indicating that pump is operated by muscle power. Is it intentional to not include this distinction? Dec 13, 2020, 19:45 by fl.infosrese...@gmail.com: > Dear

[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC 2 - Pumping proposal

2020-12-13 Thread François Lacombe
Dear all, Following some rework to take care of comments received during the first voting round of pumping proposal, here is a second proposed version https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pumping_proposal IanVG and I spent time to improve wording and make rationale section