Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Section numbers in hiking routes

2020-05-26 Thread Peter Elderson
As an example, I have redundantly tagged the sections of a hiking route with from, to and section_ref. The names still contain the same information. name=parent route name - leg - from-to *Parent route: * https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=2991780=10!52.5245!5.6135 *Section route:*

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Section numbers in hiking routes

2020-05-24 Thread Peter Elderson
Thanks for the examples. I will leave the splitting and punctuation issue for now, I think it's fine as it is. In the second example, the stage numbers should not be in the name unless the names are actually shown like that on the signs. See

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Section numbers in hiking routes

2020-05-24 Thread s8evq
First example: Superrelation GR5 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4580796) consists of the following 8 relation members: GR 5 Netherlands (9176775) GR 5 Belgium, Flanders (3121667) GR 5 Belgium, Wallonia (3121668) GR 5 Luxembourg (2790499) GR 5 Lorraine (2029679) GR 5 Vosges (1956165)

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Section numbers in hiking routes

2020-05-23 Thread Peter Elderson
YM routes tagged as superroute? Or all routes with relation members? Peter Elderson Op za 23 mei 2020 om 21:08 schreef Jo : > By the way, superroute relations in JOSM now show continuity correctly if > the last node of the last way is the same as the first node of the first > way in two

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Section numbers in hiking routes

2020-05-23 Thread Peter Elderson
The refs for the routes I check are sparse, but they are signed here and there. The legs/sections have the same ref, e.g. LAW12, but nowhere on the streets can you find the section numbers. They are found on the official website and in the printed guides. Sometimes they were added to the ref, but

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Section numbers in hiking routes

2020-05-23 Thread Jo
By the way, superroute relations in JOSM now show continuity correctly if the last node of the last way is the same as the first node of the first way in two sequential route relations. (It was a feature request I made and someone developed it). Jo On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 8:47 PM Kevin Kenny

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Section numbers in hiking routes

2020-05-23 Thread Kevin Kenny
> For now, I just want an alternative for the section/segment/leg numbers or > refs that are often in the name tag now. > They are there to get neat ordered lists in tools and applications. That > seems to work fine, but it abuses the name tag, which I am told is a problem > for searching

[Tagging] Fwd: Section numbers in hiking routes

2020-05-23 Thread Peter Elderson
For now, I just want an alternative for the section/segment/leg numbers or refs that are often in the name tag now. They are there to get neat ordered lists in tools and applications. That seems to work fine, but it abuses the name tag, which I am told is a problem for searching routines. A name