If they'd wanted to do that the github thread wouldn't have been locked.
He's never been good at taking criticism.
He confesses *all* responses will be critical, but still thinks he's right.
DaveF
On 23/05/2019 18:26, Jmapb wrote:
On 5/23/2019 12:32 PM, Tobias Zwick wrote:
Undoubtedly, the
On 5/23/2019 12:32 PM, Tobias Zwick wrote:
Undoubtedly, the developers behavior is not helping there. I have the
impression that they have almost given up on the OSM community. But this
doesn't come out of nowhere. I think it is important to understand their side
of the story if we were to
Le 23.05.19 à 18:32, Tobias Zwick a écrit :
> what would it take to reverse this?
what may help in to keep some thread here on topic and make a summary at
the end of a long thread... or maybe always made a summary like
subject : [solved] previous subject
a short summary
I am even someone who
I simply have the feeling that we are heading straight for an escalation course
here. I already see it looming that some day the plug might be pulled on iD
(being hosted on openstreetmap.org) and I really really don't want this to
happen, lest even to think about it makes me sick.
Undoubtedly,
Though repeated attempts by @bhousel and @quincylvania to declare themselves as
final arbiters of OSM tagging and dismissing everybody else is certainly not
helping.
That is really not going to work, and it is a pity because plenty of work done
of him is really great
but it is tainted by
