Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-17 Thread antony.king
I've used 'smell' on the proposal; I think more people will know that word! As an aside, there's a playground viewer app here: http://ant.homelinux.net/maps/index.html which shows (as blue icons) any playgrounds created with the new schema. It's experimental at the moment, working with a

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread Erik Johansson
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:02 AM, antony.king antony.k...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote: Hi all, We've been slowly mulling over the proposed playground extensions for the last couple of months, and I hope that we've covered all the ground that needs to be covered by now. Could those that care to

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread Erik Johansson
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:02 AM, antony.king antony.k...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote: Hi all, We've been slowly mulling over the proposed playground extensions for the last couple of months, And you did a very good job, I've always wondered what to call those hanging roundabouts myself.

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread Phil! Gold
* Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com [2010-05-14 18:29 +0200]: If you tag highway=footway with bike=yes then you don't make it exclusively for bikes. So if you tag a playground with baby=yes shouldn't that just mean that there are some baby specific toys there, and baby=no that there aren't any

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread Erik Johansson
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote: * Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com [2010-05-14 18:29 +0200]: If you tag highway=footway with bike=yes then you don't make it exclusively for bikes. So if you tag a playground with baby=yes shouldn't that just mean that there

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread John Smith
On 15 May 2010 04:23, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote: Could that be unified with other access designations? 'baby=designated' or 'baby=official'? It might be confusing to tag something arbitary as baby, wouldn't it be better to tag age appropriateness? and height appropriateness for that

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread John Smith
On 15 May 2010 04:42, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 May 2010 04:23, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote: Could that be unified with other access designations? 'baby=designated' or 'baby=official'? It might be confusing to tag something arbitary as baby, wouldn't it be

Re: [Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-14 Thread John Smith
On 15 May 2010 04:37, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote: Sure, I only want to use baby=yes to tag if there is toys for babies. This is mostly used for swings so I'm not entirely sure it's needed. :-) There could be an exclusive area for toddlers, another for children and so on, imho

[Tagging] Playground tag proposal - voting

2010-05-13 Thread antony.king
Hi all, We've been slowly mulling over the proposed playground extensions for the last couple of months, and I hope that we've covered all the ground that needs to be covered by now. Could those that care to vote, cast your votes on the page? If you disapprove, please say why and maybe we can