2011/1/12 j...@jfeldredge.com:
Having civilization as a subkey to historic is a good suggestion.
Thank you all for your feedback.
I made a starting page. I also added some initial values for
historic:period to the page, but there is still space for more detail,
e.g. historic:era to put the
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:40 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/1/12 j...@jfeldredge.com:
I made a starting page. I also added some initial values for
historic:period to the page, but there is still space for more detail,
e.g. historic:era to put the name of a
12, 2011 5:23 PM
To: m...@koppenhoefer.com ; Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] RFC: historic:civilization and historic:period Re: new
key civilization
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:40 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/1/12 j
2011/1/12 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
Am I the only one who is thinking that such information are better placed in
Wikipedia than in OSM ? Or many of this list readers decided to lazily shut
their mouth because they hope that such tags will never become popular ?
What is the next proposal : a
